Twitter

Archive

Comics

0-50

1.1 - Introduction to The Science of Cookies (1/2)22nd Jun 2016, 10:00 PM
2.2 - Introduction to The Science of Cookies (2/2)22nd Jun 2016, 10:04 PM
3.3 - Degrees of freedom and data manipulation23rd Jun 2016, 1:36 PM
4.4 - The fear of chemicals25th Jun 2016, 11:54 AM
5.5 - Negative findings of a systematic review [Untranslated & retracted]25th Jun 2016, 5:49 PM
6.6 - Super claim corrector26th Jun 2016, 8:12 AM
7.7 - What if researchers streamed their work on Twitch?27th Jun 2016, 2:20 PM
8.8 - Preliminary studies [Untranslated & retracted]29th Jun 2016, 8:25 AM
9.9 - How much is spent on research findings dissemination?29th Jun 2016, 5:08 PM
10.10 - Ignore the litterature I don't want you to read29th Jun 2016, 5:11 PM
11.11 - Unrelated graphics [Untranslated & retracted]29th Jun 2016, 5:15 PM
12.12 - Science isn't only about the results29th Jun 2016, 5:17 PM
13.13 - Science and the medias29th Jun 2016, 5:21 PM
14.14 - Successive approximations until we get closer to the Truth29th Jun 2016, 5:22 PM
15.15 - The research context matters29th Jun 2016, 5:25 PM
16.16 - Poorly reported systematic reviews [Untranslated & retracted]29th Jun 2016, 5:27 PM
17.17 - Too much research to read it all30th Jun 2016, 6:46 AM
18.18 - When statistical tools are too easy to (mis)use1st Jul 2016, 8:59 AM
19.19 - You can find research supporting any claim2nd Jul 2016, 7:38 AM
20.20 - Availability heuristic2nd Jul 2016, 6:21 PM
21.21 - Facebook echo chambers3rd Jul 2016, 7:06 AM
22.22 - Meta-analysis (concept)3rd Jul 2016, 2:38 PM
23.23 - Case study design (concept)4th Jul 2016, 10:04 AM
24.24 - Not all research happens in a lab4th Jul 2016, 1:17 PM
25.25 - Peer-review (concept)5th Jul 2016, 7:52 AM
26.26 - Journal subscriptions5th Jul 2016, 3:00 PM
27.27 - Students wanted to contribute to the research project6th Jul 2016, 7:19 AM
28.28 - The power of comments6th Jul 2016, 1:48 PM
29.29 - Don't trust appearances7th Jul 2016, 6:14 AM
30.30 - Publishing bachelor theses as research7th Jul 2016, 2:48 PM
31.31 - Study limitations8th Jul 2016, 7:30 AM
32.32 - Studies stopped early for benefit [Untranslated & retracted]8th Jul 2016, 1:37 PM
33.33 - The Alltrials project9th Jul 2016, 6:57 AM
34.34 - Poorly peer-reviewed9th Jul 2016, 2:31 PM
35.35 - The language of science10th Jul 2016, 6:11 AM
36.36 - Heterogeneity of treatment responses10th Jul 2016, 12:52 PM
37.37 - Operational definitions11th Jul 2016, 6:47 AM
38.38 - Blinding therapists11th Jul 2016, 1:15 PM
39.39 - Journal impact factors12th Jul 2016, 6:38 AM
40.Médecine fondée sur les preuves (EBM)12th Jul 2016, 10:13 AM
41.41 - Decision aid tools13th Jul 2016, 7:22 AM
42.42 - Minority views and false balance13th Jul 2016, 1:17 PM
43.43 - Pragmatic versus explanatory trials14th Jul 2016, 7:19 AM
44.44 - Who reads most research?14th Jul 2016, 4:00 PM
45.45 - Framing information16th Jul 2016, 7:51 AM
46.46 - Being a researcher involves risks16th Jul 2016, 1:31 PM
47.47 - How to read a scientific citation17th Jul 2016, 7:00 AM
48.48 - A recent study with alarming results [Untranslated & retracted]17th Jul 2016, 1:09 PM
49.49 - Relative and absolute risks [Untranslated & retracted]18th Jul 2016, 8:00 AM
50.50 - Self-reports19th Jul 2016, 8:00 AM

51-100

51.51 - CONSORT reporting recommendations20th Jul 2016, 8:00 AM
52.52 - A sample of something21st Jul 2016, 8:00 AM
53.53 - Scientific graffitis22nd Jul 2016, 8:18 AM
54.54 - Holidays are meant for drawing22nd Jul 2016, 1:39 PM
55.55 - Emotional arguments23rd Jul 2016, 7:22 AM
56.56 - Forgotten diseases [Untranslated & retracted]24th Jul 2016, 8:32 AM
57.Créer une question de recherche (PICO)25th Jul 2016, 8:00 AM
58.Où chercher un cookie26th Jul 2016, 8:00 AM
59.Obtenir un cookie27th Jul 2016, 8:00 AM
60.Obtenir un cookie (2)28th Jul 2016, 8:00 AM
61.61 - Iconography and symbols29th Jul 2016, 7:00 AM
62.62 - Medical comics [Untranslated & retracted]30th Jul 2016, 7:17 AM
63.63 - Online surveys meant for teachers [Untranslated & retracted]31st Jul 2016, 7:55 AM
64.64 - The best answer is I don't know [Untranslated & retracted]1st Aug 2016, 7:33 AM
65.65 - Consensus among whom?2nd Aug 2016, 7:21 AM
66.66 - Taped problems [Untranslated & retracted]3rd Aug 2016, 7:46 AM
67.Anatomie d'un cookie4th Aug 2016, 7:19 AM
68.Sensibilité et spécificité5th Aug 2016, 7:33 AM
69.69 - Searching for health evidence [Untranslated & retracted]6th Aug 2016, 7:32 AM
70.70 - Science and politics7th Aug 2016, 7:17 AM
71.71 - This webcomic does not exist8th Aug 2016, 7:07 AM
72.72 - Conflicts of interests9th Aug 2016, 7:13 AM
73.73 - Years wasted searching things we knew already10th Aug 2016, 7:05 AM
74.74 - You've got to decide between drawing and hobbies11th Aug 2016, 7:04 AM
75.75 - But what is natural?12th Aug 2016, 7:03 AM
76.76 - She did not follow the protocol [Untranslated & retracted]13th Aug 2016, 7:02 AM
77.77 - Pokemon Go and exercise [Untranslated & retracted]14th Aug 2016, 7:07 AM
78.78 - Celebrities had much more impact15th Aug 2016, 6:01 AM
79.79 - Stories used to teach scientific concepts and medical terms16th Aug 2016, 4:22 AM
80.80 - Test yourself to remember17th Aug 2016, 6:09 AM
81.81 - Citation counts means anything18th Aug 2016, 5:53 AM
82.82 - Unregulated medical claims19th Aug 2016, 6:03 AM
83.83 - Wikipedia as a source of knowledge [Untranslated & retracted]20th Aug 2016, 9:34 AM
84.84 - Can't tell who is a researcher21st Aug 2016, 7:07 AM
85.85 - Research is not meant for this question22nd Aug 2016, 6:15 AM
86.86 - EBM T-shirts23rd Aug 2016, 6:16 AM
87.87 - Inter-rater reliability and assessments24th Aug 2016, 12:41 PM
88.88 - No time meant to communicate the results [Untranslated & retracted]25th Aug 2016, 4:55 PM
89.89 - NASA research now available to all26th Aug 2016, 6:17 AM
90.90 - Unwanted balance27th Aug 2016, 3:36 PM
91.91 - Retractionwatch28th Aug 2016, 8:32 AM
92.92 - Where does copyright end?29th Aug 2016, 1:06 AM
93.93 - Calorie in calorie out, sport to lose weight30th Aug 2016, 1:37 AM
94.94 - Correcting the literature championship31st Aug 2016, 12:58 AM
95.95 - Olympic athletes try everything1st Sep 2016, 5:16 AM
96.96 - Publish or perish2nd Sep 2016, 4:06 AM
97.97 - Scientists never change their minds3rd Sep 2016, 8:06 AM
98.98 - Hard to find trustworthy source4th Sep 2016, 3:49 PM
99.99 - Already acted on it [Untranslated & retracted]5th Sep 2016, 4:41 PM
100.100 - Unstoppable curiosity6th Sep 2016, 7:28 PM

101-150

101.101 - Make it look equivalent7th Sep 2016, 3:03 PM
102.102 - Our profession should be terminated8th Sep 2016, 5:00 PM
103.103 - Replication studies are all over the place9th Sep 2016, 6:55 PM
104.Quelques sources non scientifiques du savoir11th Sep 2016, 3:54 PM
105.105 - Wonder drug12th Sep 2016, 4:09 PM
106.106 - Celebrate science on this day13th Sep 2016, 7:34 PM
107.Percevoir l'efficacité de quelque chose14th Sep 2016, 12:59 PM
108.108 - Unintended consequences and complex systems15th Sep 2016, 7:26 PM
109.109 - Misciting primary sources16th Sep 2016, 10:41 PM
110.110 - Assessment tools applied to the wrong population17th Sep 2016, 7:16 PM
111.111 - Skepticism does not sell as much as hype18th Sep 2016, 11:39 AM
112.Types de questions de recherche en santé19th Sep 2016, 6:53 PM
113.113 - Levels of analysis and transferability of findings20th Sep 2016, 5:26 PM
114.114 - Difficult medical decision21st Sep 2016, 7:11 PM
115.115 - You can do research from anywhere in the world22nd Sep 2016, 10:13 PM
116.116 - Les styles d'apprentissage [Translation=comic 117]23rd Sep 2016, 6:57 PM
117.117 - Learning styles [EN]23rd Sep 2016, 7:02 PM
118.118 - Too many lobbies25th Sep 2016, 4:21 PM
119.119 - Incentivized to publish fantasy-science26th Sep 2016, 7:07 PM
120.120 - Teach where you can27th Sep 2016, 8:25 PM
121.121 - Value-based research, what matters to you?28th Sep 2016, 6:53 PM
122.122 - Trustworthy science welcome29th Sep 2016, 5:14 PM
123.123 - Can we stop searching now?30th Sep 2016, 5:33 PM
124.124 - Trying comes with risks1st Oct 2016, 8:17 PM
125.125 - Involving patients in research2nd Oct 2016, 2:54 PM
126.126 - I know it works3rd Oct 2016, 9:24 PM
127.127 - Searching for like-minded people at the wrong place4th Oct 2016, 8:23 PM
128.128 - Explaining often means simplifying the grand puzzle5th Oct 2016, 8:54 AM
129.129 - Guidelines are meant to be used along with judgement6th Oct 2016, 8:45 PM
130.130 - Too early diagnosis [Untranslated & retracted]7th Oct 2016, 5:36 PM
131.131 - First we should replicate the results8th Oct 2016, 7:23 PM
132.132 - The problem was not of medical nature9th Oct 2016, 9:09 AM
133.133 - Checklists aren't always exhaustive10th Oct 2016, 6:12 PM
134.134 - Searching for a research study (exercise) [Untranslated & retracted]11th Oct 2016, 7:11 AM
135.135 - Recall exercise [Untranslated & retracted]11th Oct 2016, 8:47 AM
136.136 - Citing a research study (exercise) [Untranslated & retracted]12th Oct 2016, 7:06 AM
137.137 - Ask for what you want13th Oct 2016, 8:38 AM
138.138 - How do you want to be called? Patient? Sick?14th Oct 2016, 7:41 AM
139.139 - [Cover]14th Oct 2016, 7:17 PM
140.140 - Translation tools [Untranslated & retracted]15th Oct 2016, 7:10 AM
141.141 - Parachutes and huge beneficial effects16th Oct 2016, 10:21 AM
142.142 - Navigation tips16th Oct 2016, 1:20 PM
143.143 - Confounding exercise [Untranslated & retracted]17th Oct 2016, 3:18 PM
144.144 - Old and uncriticized theories taught [Untranslated & retracted]18th Oct 2016, 6:48 PM
145.145 - Predatory journals19th Oct 2016, 12:14 PM
146.146 - No measured side effects [Untranslated & retracted]20th Oct 2016, 4:40 PM
147.147 - Best evidence in your context21st Oct 2016, 3:57 PM
148.148 - Worst than no research22nd Oct 2016, 10:14 AM
149.149 - Trusting what the study authors say22nd Oct 2016, 1:24 PM
150.150 - Patients have power, what questions could they ask to trialists?23rd Oct 2016, 12:49 PM

151-200

151.151 - Collecting research questions at work24th Oct 2016, 3:33 PM
152.152 - Journal clubs25th Oct 2016, 3:58 PM
153.153 - What happens once the study is published?26th Oct 2016, 4:12 PM
154.154 - File drawers and publication bias26th Oct 2016, 7:55 PM
155.155 - Science is "too complicated", they say again and again27th Oct 2016, 7:50 PM
156.156 - Symbols in health research (exercise)29th Oct 2016, 9:43 AM
157.157 - The study authors weren't listening30th Oct 2016, 7:04 AM
158.Outils d'aide à la décision clinique au chevet du patient31st Oct 2016, 7:25 AM
159.159 - This guy is an expert after all1st Nov 2016, 5:01 PM
160.160 - Highly misinformed paradox2nd Nov 2016, 5:05 PM
161.161 - A matter of difficult expectations3rd Nov 2016, 4:40 PM
162.162 - Priorities according to whom?4th Nov 2016, 8:15 PM
163.163 - We've always taught it this way (tradition)5th Nov 2016, 10:20 AM
164.164 - Trust me! (says the website)6th Nov 2016, 8:06 AM
165.165 - Free access, we aren't there yet7th Nov 2016, 4:53 PM
166.166 - Moving the goalpost and arguing8th Nov 2016, 3:41 PM
167.167 - Social media caused more confusion9th Nov 2016, 11:31 AM
168.168 - Balanced presentation of benefits and harms10th Nov 2016, 5:02 PM
169.169 - Burning out peer reviewers11th Nov 2016, 7:27 PM
170.170 - Language barriers12th Nov 2016, 8:33 AM
171.171 - This is old news, but still novel!13th Nov 2016, 9:56 AM
172.172 - Books can get old very fast14th Nov 2016, 5:37 PM
173.173 - They have more time to do research and more interest15th Nov 2016, 5:01 PM
174.174 - Buy a doctorate16th Nov 2016, 11:53 AM
175.175 - Surrogate endpoints and surrogate outcomes17th Nov 2016, 8:02 AM
176.176 - Independent research institute18th Nov 2016, 5:51 PM
177.177 - Our university's reputation is at stake19th Nov 2016, 1:28 PM
178.178 - Overdiagnosis is in the air, preconditions20th Nov 2016, 12:51 PM
179.179 - A silly decision aid21st Nov 2016, 6:00 PM
180.180 - There is an app for everything22nd Nov 2016, 4:18 PM
181.181 - MeSH, medical subject headings23rd Nov 2016, 7:31 AM
182.182 - Medical recertification23rd Nov 2016, 7:34 AM
183.183 - Retractations23rd Nov 2016, 6:40 PM
184.184 - Side effects of The Science of Cookies24th Nov 2016, 5:31 PM
185.185 - Feeling different among them25th Nov 2016, 4:03 PM
186.186 - More research, always more research26th Nov 2016, 9:29 AM
187.187 - How big is this change? How important?27th Nov 2016, 3:10 PM
188.188 - Statistically significant, clinically significant, what's the significance?28th Nov 2016, 5:35 PM
189.189 - Overtesting the healthy28th Nov 2016, 5:39 PM
190.190 - Meta-analyzing creature [Untranslated]29th Nov 2016, 7:48 PM
191.191 - Blacklists and whitelists30th Nov 2016, 1:06 PM
192.192 - Until old practices die out1st Dec 2016, 5:37 PM
193.193 - Trustworthy keywords2nd Dec 2016, 7:07 PM
194.194 - Widening diagnostic criterias3rd Dec 2016, 8:37 AM
195.195 - Moderate skepticism4th Dec 2016, 11:10 AM
196.196 - Treatment thresholds5th Dec 2016, 3:36 PM
197.197 - Searching at the wrong place6th Dec 2016, 8:42 PM
198.198 - Shorter translations [Untranslated & retracted]7th Dec 2016, 5:49 PM
199.199 - How to build Science?8th Dec 2016, 5:34 PM
200.200 - Too cheap to be effective?9th Dec 2016, 6:56 PM

201-250

201.201 - Feeling active10th Dec 2016, 4:50 PM
202.202 - Books available in the waiting room11th Dec 2016, 9:50 AM
203.203 - Baselince characteristics were slightly different12th Dec 2016, 6:22 PM
204.204 - Improving the research building blocks13th Dec 2016, 6:00 AM
205.205 - Abstract abstracts14th Dec 2016, 6:07 AM
206.206 - Not enough space to report the study details15th Dec 2016, 8:57 AM
207.207 - Deprescribing16th Dec 2016, 8:02 AM
208.208 - Primary and secondary sources of information17th Dec 2016, 12:49 PM
209.209 - Self-citations, cite thyself18th Dec 2016, 8:10 AM
210.210 - Critically appraising science-inspired comic strips19th Dec 2016, 3:26 PM
211.211 - Mixing apples with oranges20th Dec 2016, 5:45 PM
212.212 - Vaccination rates are declining, we need better education21st Dec 2016, 1:55 PM
213.213 - Marketing and seeding trials22nd Dec 2016, 5:37 PM
214.214 - Pay first, find out if the study is relevant afterwards23rd Dec 2016, 1:41 PM
215.215 - The do nothing option24th Dec 2016, 7:53 PM
216.216 - Doctors aren't immune from standards25th Dec 2016, 9:28 AM
217.217 - International "Remove a diagnosis" day26th Dec 2016, 6:08 PM
218.218 - Teaching what can be measured26th Dec 2016, 6:11 PM
219.219 - Make it simple26th Dec 2016, 6:13 PM
220.220 - Advanced care directives26th Dec 2016, 6:15 PM
221.221 - Study retracted for unknown reasons26th Dec 2016, 6:18 PM
222.222 - Don't tell anyone he's falsifying data!26th Dec 2016, 6:21 PM
223.223 - What you make public can be modified26th Dec 2016, 6:24 PM
224.224 - Side effects reported in registries vs side effects reported in the study report26th Dec 2016, 6:26 PM
225.225 - How specific is this benefit description?27th Dec 2016, 8:30 PM
226.226 - Certainy, risks and uncertainty28th Dec 2016, 8:18 PM
227.227 - Viruses do not distinguish28th Dec 2016, 8:20 PM
228.228 - Data sharing comes with a cost28th Dec 2016, 8:21 PM
229.229 - Paternalism [Untranslated & retracted]28th Dec 2016, 8:24 PM
230.230 - Why use comparison groups?28th Dec 2016, 8:29 PM
231.231 - Consensus criterias and thresholds29th Dec 2016, 5:51 PM
232.232 - Academics biased against women31st Dec 2016, 4:49 AM
233.233 - Misconceptions are due to emerge31st Dec 2016, 4:21 PM
234.234 - The James Lind Alliance1st Jan 2017, 1:01 PM
235.235 - Visual dropdown menu research concept explanations1st Jan 2017, 2:14 PM
236.236 - Burden of proof2nd Jan 2017, 9:04 AM
237.237 - Ever smaller "anomalies" get detected by medical tests2nd Jan 2017, 9:06 AM
238.238 - Guidelines written by conflicted individuals2nd Jan 2017, 9:07 AM
239.239 - Intoxstop internet module2nd Jan 2017, 9:11 AM
240.240 - Crowdfunded research2nd Jan 2017, 9:15 AM
241.241 - What are the risks if I do poor research?2nd Jan 2017, 9:20 AM
242.242 - Selective reporting of study results2nd Jan 2017, 9:22 AM
243.243 - Maximum transparency in research2nd Jan 2017, 9:24 AM
244.244 - Quantifying health3rd Jan 2017, 10:10 AM
245.245 - When confidence intervals are forgotten4th Jan 2017, 4:26 PM
246.246 - Scientific badges to incentivize productive practices5th Jan 2017, 4:49 PM
247.247 - Taught how to remove diagnosis6th Jan 2017, 9:08 PM
248.248 - Dismissing criticisms for questionable reasons7th Jan 2017, 8:39 AM
249.249 - The test outcome changes nothing8th Jan 2017, 3:47 PM
250.250 - Anxiety-related effectiveness9th Jan 2017, 4:39 PM

251-300

251.251 - Scientific jargon9th Jan 2017, 4:41 PM
252.252 - Corrections much less visible than the error itself9th Jan 2017, 4:45 PM
253.253 - Hypoallergenic9th Jan 2017, 4:48 PM
254.254 - Fee news, high quality news, both?9th Jan 2017, 4:51 PM
255.255 - Transparency won't fix everything9th Jan 2017, 4:57 PM
256.256 - Read the small prints9th Jan 2017, 4:59 PM
257.257 - More education was not the answer10th Jan 2017, 8:51 PM
258.Revues systématiques : Qu'est-ce?11th Jan 2017, 4:57 PM
259.259 - Funded given we produce spectacular results12th Jan 2017, 7:50 PM
260.260 - Blind to the study results13th Jan 2017, 7:38 PM
261.261 - This guy is kinda atypical and rather quiet14th Jan 2017, 8:43 PM
262.262 - Wasting resources on ineffective treatments14th Jan 2017, 8:47 PM
263.263 - Making plans for the unlikely14th Jan 2017, 8:49 PM
264.264 - Politicians acting fast14th Jan 2017, 8:53 PM
265.265 - I'm either a geek or a scientists depending how I read14th Jan 2017, 8:56 PM
266.266 - Medicalizing normal14th Jan 2017, 8:57 PM
267.267 - Ideas all day long14th Jan 2017, 8:59 PM
268.268 - Patient representatives given no power15th Jan 2017, 9:29 PM
269.269 - Diagnosed by a smartphone16th Jan 2017, 8:42 PM
270.270 - The scientific community17th Jan 2017, 8:37 PM
271.271 - Not enough care, enough care, overcare18th Jan 2017, 4:56 PM
272.272 - How long should we follow study participants?18th Jan 2017, 5:00 PM
273.273 - This is not the only study on this topic18th Jan 2017, 5:01 PM
274.274 - Means flawed by outliers18th Jan 2017, 5:02 PM
275.275 - Meaningless means18th Jan 2017, 5:03 PM
276.276 - This test does not predict the future18th Jan 2017, 5:05 PM
277.277 - Frugal innovations in medicine18th Jan 2017, 5:07 PM
278.278 - Slow price increases19th Jan 2017, 8:05 PM
279.279 - Protocol adherence20th Jan 2017, 11:33 PM
280.280 - Faking journal impact factors21st Jan 2017, 6:47 PM
281.281 - Standards changed over the years22nd Jan 2017, 5:44 PM
282.282 - Subgroup analysis23rd Jan 2017, 3:19 PM
283.283 - Absolute and relative risk differences24th Jan 2017, 1:05 PM
284.284 - Spinning the study results in your favour25th Jan 2017, 9:38 AM
285.285 - We needed a consensus26th Jan 2017, 7:38 PM
286.286 - What are the risks if I overdiagnose?27th Jan 2017, 7:12 PM
287.287 - Too much paperwork28th Jan 2017, 8:01 AM
288.288 - Nature makes no sense29th Jan 2017, 7:46 AM
289.289 - Question your practices30th Jan 2017, 7:54 PM
290.290 - Old-fashioned things to do for better health31st Jan 2017, 7:14 PM
291.291 - Comparing risks with other daily risks1st Feb 2017, 5:11 PM
292.292 - How to make Science of Cookies comics2nd Feb 2017, 3:45 PM
293.293 - Disconfirmation bias3rd Feb 2017, 10:02 AM
294.294 - Expectations made the medicine effective4th Feb 2017, 1:11 PM
295.295 - Eminence based medicine5th Feb 2017, 9:28 AM
296.296 - Was it truth or myth?6th Feb 2017, 2:55 PM
297.297 - "Feel good" health campaign7th Feb 2017, 3:00 PM
298.298 - Unrelated conclusions8th Feb 2017, 1:00 PM
299.299 - Minor typos8th Feb 2017, 1:02 PM
300.300 - Genes offer some protection (to an extent)8th Feb 2017, 1:08 PM

301-350

301.301 - This "revolutionary" thing is soon going to happen9th Feb 2017, 12:03 PM
302.Qualité des preuves10th Feb 2017, 6:30 AM
303.303 - Update guidelines and include the new poorly done study NOW!11th Feb 2017, 3:18 PM
304.304 - Minimally clinically important difference (= does a difference this big matter to stakeholders?)12th Feb 2017, 6:06 PM
305.305 - Too many things I'd like to draw (okay, I did a few)13th Feb 2017, 12:17 PM
306.306 - Genetic risk, what do you do with it?13th Feb 2017, 12:20 PM
307.307 - Choosing Wisely Canada was there13th Feb 2017, 12:24 PM
308.308 - Not really a controversy according to all but one13th Feb 2017, 12:25 PM
309.309 - Social media as a form of continuing education13th Feb 2017, 12:27 PM
310.310 - A "large" beneficial effect13th Feb 2017, 12:29 PM
311.311 - Acknowledging faked data will backfire in my face13th Feb 2017, 12:31 PM
312.312 - A new study shows (stuff)14th Feb 2017, 12:27 PM
313.313 - My experience as a volunteer translator for the Cochrane health organization15th Feb 2017, 3:50 PM
314.314 - Tests results on a continuum16th Feb 2017, 4:27 PM
315.315 - Competition: Who can best explain science?17th Feb 2017, 12:22 PM
316.316 - Calendar of key health research concepts17th Feb 2017, 12:24 PM
317.317 - I'm not sharing what I found!17th Feb 2017, 12:26 PM
318.318 - The patient getting the most attention17th Feb 2017, 12:29 PM
319.319 - Filling the gaps in the story17th Feb 2017, 12:30 PM
320.320 - Publish more? Okay, I'll make them shorter17th Feb 2017, 12:32 PM
321.321 - Pick the biggest number and put it in the news17th Feb 2017, 12:35 PM
322.322 - "Difficult patients" (=me)18th Feb 2017, 10:13 AM
323.323 - This is a normal part of life19th Feb 2017, 4:30 PM
324.324 - FIRST! Skipped steps though19th Feb 2017, 4:32 PM
325.325 - Getting paranoid about criticisms19th Feb 2017, 4:34 PM
326.326 - Outcome switching20th Feb 2017, 9:58 PM
327.Réactions différentes à la même critique21st Feb 2017, 4:35 PM
328.328 - What is there evidence on in a hospital?22nd Feb 2017, 11:08 AM
329.329 - Citation cartels23rd Feb 2017, 7:15 PM
330.330 - Come with a notepad and a friend23rd Feb 2017, 7:19 PM
331.331 - Successful research23rd Feb 2017, 7:21 PM
332.332 - Top secret diagnosis23rd Feb 2017, 7:23 PM
333.333 - All predictions were correct23rd Feb 2017, 7:27 PM
334.334 - Miracles vs research24th Feb 2017, 9:38 PM
335.335 - Scientists looking for truth? How old fashioned!25th Feb 2017, 7:29 PM
336.336 - What would an independent expert say?26th Feb 2017, 5:21 PM
337.337 - Everyone does it, it must be safe, right?26th Feb 2017, 5:25 PM
338.338 - Transparency matters no matter what26th Feb 2017, 5:26 PM
339.339 - A good study and/or a famous journal?26th Feb 2017, 5:28 PM
340.340 - Skeptical about science comics26th Feb 2017, 5:31 PM
341.341 - IN MICE!26th Feb 2017, 5:33 PM
342.342 - Country allegiance?27th Feb 2017, 12:59 PM
343.343 - Blank study protocols28th Feb 2017, 11:58 AM
344.344 - Was the feedback you got accurate?28th Feb 2017, 12:03 PM
345.345 - Nobody believes in fake news28th Feb 2017, 12:05 PM
346.346 - Relative % increase28th Feb 2017, 6:28 PM
347.347 - We did that "thing" the others did1st Mar 2017, 7:33 PM
348.348 - Hyped funding1st Mar 2017, 9:06 PM
349.349 - Flawed sampling (selection bias)2nd Mar 2017, 6:04 AM
350.350 - Allegiance bias3rd Mar 2017, 8:52 PM

351-400

351.351 - Unrealistif demands from the funder4th Mar 2017, 11:07 AM
352.352 - Statistical power (general concept)5th Mar 2017, 3:54 PM
353.353 - Notifications when study gets cited6th Mar 2017, 5:12 PM
354.354 - How do you justify doing this study?7th Mar 2017, 1:36 PM
355.355 - Science is sometimes self-correcting (if someone does the fixing)8th Mar 2017, 5:58 AM
356.356 - Patient preferences taken into account9th Mar 2017, 5:58 AM
357.357 - Composite endpoints10th Mar 2017, 6:13 AM
358.358 - History bias10th Mar 2017, 6:18 AM
359.359 - The abstract did not tell me: is this an increase or a decrease?10th Mar 2017, 6:22 AM
360.360 - Please point out the flaws to us (and get silenced!)11th Mar 2017, 8:34 AM
361.361 - Conflicts of interests among patient representatives12th Mar 2017, 10:04 AM
362.362 - Fake study generator13th Mar 2017, 6:29 AM
363.363 - Silencing scientists13th Mar 2017, 6:34 AM
364.364 - Is this therapist evidence-based?14th Mar 2017, 7:56 AM
365.365 - Had he not pointed out these errors then...14th Mar 2017, 7:58 AM
366.366 - Surely researchers know this stuff... right?15th Mar 2017, 6:08 AM
367.367 - Infinite number of measurement scales15th Mar 2017, 6:11 AM
368.368 - Shotgun research15th Mar 2017, 8:49 AM
369.369 - Long-term effects not known in the short-term16th Mar 2017, 6:31 AM
370.370 - Trust me this study will be published16th Mar 2017, 6:37 AM
371.371 - Systematic reviews: Benefits [Untranslated and Retracted]16th Mar 2017, 6:26 PM
372.372 - A small risk multiplied many times is still a small risk17th Mar 2017, 7:18 AM
373.373 - Titles matter (you read this title right!)17th Mar 2017, 7:22 AM
374.374 - This data is ours17th Mar 2017, 7:26 AM
375.375 - Keeping morale up18th Mar 2017, 7:19 AM
376.376 - What did you measure?18th Mar 2017, 7:21 AM
377.377 - No need to be an expert to read "in rats"18th Mar 2017, 7:24 AM
378.378 - Volunteering researcher19th Mar 2017, 4:10 PM
379.379 - Killing competition through overpricing products20th Mar 2017, 6:26 AM
380.380 - More drugs or fewer drugs?20th Mar 2017, 6:28 AM
381.381 - Your treatment will be a comic book21st Mar 2017, 5:09 AM
382.382 - One of these ingredients gotta have active properties22nd Mar 2017, 8:58 AM
383.383 - Systematic reviews: Risks and limitations [Untranslated and Retracted]23rd Mar 2017, 5:37 AM
384.384 - Learn by heart what you don't need to24th Mar 2017, 6:52 AM
385.385 - How subjective can a Yes/No questionnaire be?24th Mar 2017, 9:17 AM
386.386 - You could read instead25th Mar 2017, 4:08 PM
387.387 - Unmentioned alternatives26th Mar 2017, 3:56 PM
388.388 - Don't want to retract a study (editor's perspective)27th Mar 2017, 8:06 AM
389.389 - Never say anything, never be wrong28th Mar 2017, 12:51 PM
390.Biais des survivants29th Mar 2017, 6:15 AM
391.391 - Misattribution of memories30th Mar 2017, 6:20 AM
392.392 - Too big to fail professor31st Mar 2017, 10:44 AM
393.393 - What is included in this category?31st Mar 2017, 10:46 AM
394.394 - Using grad students as slaves1st Apr 2017, 12:52 PM
395.395 - Systematic reviews: Quality assessment (modified Amstar) [Untranslated & Retracted]1st Apr 2017, 1:47 PM
396.396 - New drugs mostly don't work on average2nd Apr 2017, 4:05 PM
397.397 - Following professionals on Facebook3rd Apr 2017, 5:16 PM
398.398 - We didn't do what we just did4th Apr 2017, 5:59 PM
399.399 - Courage l'éléphant pharmacien [Untranslated]5th Apr 2017, 6:53 AM
400.400 - Too many things simply don't work6th Apr 2017, 11:46 AM

401-450

401.401 - Measuring self-reported knowledge7th Apr 2017, 7:36 AM
402.402 - Dungeons and healthcare8th Apr 2017, 3:47 PM
403.403 - Systematic reviews: Assessing quality (brief assessment) [Untranslated & retracted]9th Apr 2017, 11:17 AM
404.404 - Stop hyping my research10th Apr 2017, 10:38 AM
405.405 - Systematic review: Qualitative example CD011787 [Untranslated]10th Apr 2017, 1:08 PM
406.406 - Don't trust the comics!11th Apr 2017, 6:44 PM
407.407 - This drug prevents cancer12th Apr 2017, 3:23 PM
408.408 - Reality is reality, no matter what you believe13th Apr 2017, 10:30 AM
409.409 - Pay to fix others' errors14th Apr 2017, 6:38 AM
410.410 - Costly mistakes within the comics15th Apr 2017, 9:58 AM
411.411 - Thinking all the time16th Apr 2017, 3:51 PM
412.412 - Tiny errors can be found everywhere17th Apr 2017, 2:28 PM
413.413 - They all look the same19th Apr 2017, 10:19 AM
414.414 - Incomplete checklist20th Apr 2017, 6:46 AM
415.415 - More tests, always more tests21st Apr 2017, 6:52 AM
416.416 - Poorly disguised placebo22nd Apr 2017, 2:42 PM
417.417 - March for Science23rd Apr 2017, 1:12 PM
418.418 - Systematic reviews: Future developments [Untranslated & retracted]24th Apr 2017, 7:43 AM
419.419 - Systematic reviews: How important are the results? [Untranslated & retracted]25th Apr 2017, 10:49 AM
420.420 - Arbitrary p-value threshold26th Apr 2017, 8:38 AM
421.421 - Chasing unicorns27th Apr 2017, 8:45 AM
422.422 - Evidence alert systems and EvidenceAlerts McMaster28th Apr 2017, 8:02 AM
423.423 - What research did stakeholders want to begin with?29th Apr 2017, 1:14 PM
424.424 - Life has a cost30th Apr 2017, 1:36 PM
425.425 - Slightly modified test [Untranslated & retracted]1st May 2017, 9:37 AM
426.426 - Share the research with your doctor2nd May 2017, 11:55 AM
427.427 - Must meet quotas3rd May 2017, 3:05 PM
428.428 - Systematic reviews: Assessing quality (applicability) [Untranslated & retracted]4th May 2017, 12:35 PM
429.429 - Theory vs real-life5th May 2017, 5:57 PM
430.430 - Give me your data or else-6th May 2017, 6:38 PM
431.431 - Please do our research for us7th May 2017, 8:32 AM
432.432 - How did participants understand your questions?8th May 2017, 9:42 AM
433.433 - "Large" scientific impact9th May 2017, 9:16 AM
434.434 - Tests are for the doctors, not you10th May 2017, 9:39 AM
435.435 - Well-selected testimonials11th May 2017, 9:21 AM
436.436 - Humorous research12th May 2017, 10:21 AM
437.437 - Aware of ALL diseases13th May 2017, 1:49 PM
438.438 - You can criticize anything14th May 2017, 3:25 PM
439.439 - Think about your practices, reflective practice15th May 2017, 9:14 AM
440.440 - Best practice of some time ago16th May 2017, 10:48 AM
441.441 - Share your work or get the glory18th May 2017, 7:23 AM
442.442 - Thank you for your criticisms19th May 2017, 2:18 PM
443.443 - Sunk costs20th May 2017, 7:15 PM
444.444 - It's "only" herbs, not drugs21st May 2017, 3:23 PM
445.445 - This work cannot be reproduced22nd May 2017, 12:01 PM
446.446 - You can decide23rd May 2017, 8:40 AM
447.447 - PubPeer and post-publication peer-review24th May 2017, 9:54 AM
448.448 - Fake research25th May 2017, 11:14 AM
449.449 - Copyright clearance26th May 2017, 6:27 AM
450.450 - What do scientists do most of the time? Not always research...27th May 2017, 6:04 PM

451-500

451.451 - Unecessary health tests and doing too much for no good reason28th May 2017, 8:46 AM
452.452 - Typical questions from research illustrators29th May 2017, 9:19 AM
453.453 - Removing limitations is the way to publication30th May 2017, 6:21 AM
454.454 - Sexuality matters for patients31st May 2017, 8:51 AM
455.Régularité du contenu de plantes [Untranslated]1st Jun 2017, 9:34 AM
456.456 - Future study impact2nd Jun 2017, 5:43 PM
457.457 - Screening should be a choice3rd Jun 2017, 10:46 AM
458.458 - Pick a peer-reviewer you like4th Jun 2017, 6:00 PM
459.459 - How did you name this medicine?5th Jun 2017, 1:15 PM
460.460 - Time takes too long6th Jun 2017, 7:59 AM
461.461 - Monetary incentives for each patient enrolled7th Jun 2017, 10:46 AM
462.462 - Trying to be everything8th Jun 2017, 6:18 AM
463.Recherche qualitative : Exemple points de vue de parents vivant en Suisse sur la vaccination [Untranslated]9th Jun 2017, 7:07 AM
464.464 - Did the same mistakes as others10th Jun 2017, 7:22 PM
465.465 - Best practice advice was followed, but when?11th Jun 2017, 7:52 PM
466.466 - Moving the goalpost with impossible requirements12th Jun 2017, 9:03 AM
467.467 - Must try to prove I'm wrong if I want to be right13th Jun 2017, 1:05 PM
468.468 - Wasted time spent searching14th Jun 2017, 11:27 AM
469.469 - Subjective symptom descriptions15th Jun 2017, 11:48 AM
470.470 - Ad hominem16th Jun 2017, 10:20 AM
471.471 - Path of least chance of getting sued17th Jun 2017, 9:28 PM
472.472 - Bury harms in the study supplements18th Jun 2017, 6:06 PM
473.473 - You can't fix by analysis what you broke by design19th Jun 2017, 9:13 AM
474.474 - Unclear health guidelines20th Jun 2017, 9:15 AM
475.475 - Non-inferior treatment (given a margin)21st Jun 2017, 7:23 AM
476.476 - Make the healthy sick again!22nd Jun 2017, 10:04 AM
477.477 - The best least worst terrible option23rd Jun 2017, 6:33 PM
478.478 - Doing nothing will get me blamed24th Jun 2017, 9:28 PM
479.479 - The perfect screening test (for industry)26th Jun 2017, 8:45 AM
480.480 - Someone should do this research27th Jun 2017, 3:22 PM
481.481 - Children as peer-reviewers28th Jun 2017, 5:12 PM
482.482 - "People suffering from..."29th Jun 2017, 6:50 AM
483.483 - Better a random one than none30th Jun 2017, 6:52 AM
484.484 - Should you correct this anomaly in your illustration?1st Jul 2017, 9:06 AM
485.485 - Clumsy harm definitions2nd Jul 2017, 1:48 PM
486.486 - Randomised controlled trial: Routine resite of intravenous catheters3rd Jul 2017, 3:13 PM
487.487 - No criticisms means...?4th Jul 2017, 3:54 PM
488.488 - The master said, the master they imitate5th Jul 2017, 9:40 AM
489.489 - Randomised controlled trial: Larval therapy for venous leg ulcers7th Jul 2017, 7:10 AM
490.490 - Research is not required8th Jul 2017, 2:20 PM
491.491 - Tested on the healthy9th Jul 2017, 7:06 PM
492.492 - Illustrators have conflicts too11th Jul 2017, 6:27 AM
493.493 - Is it unethical over here?13th Jul 2017, 6:05 AM
494.494 - Measuring known adverse events14th Jul 2017, 11:50 AM
495.495 - Focus on drawing useful studies16th Jul 2017, 7:36 AM
496.496 - Randomised controlled trials: Amoxicillin for lower respiratory infections17th Jul 2017, 6:56 AM
497.497 - "I trust my experience"18th Jul 2017, 8:55 AM
498.498 - Different standards in animal research19th Jul 2017, 5:26 PM
499.499 - Healthy volunteers20th Jul 2017, 4:38 PM
500.500 - Journalists should know when a study is about mice22nd Jul 2017, 1:38 PM

501-550

501.501 - The consequence isn't much of a deterrent23rd Jul 2017, 5:34 PM
502.502 - Randomised controlled trial: H1N1 influenza vaccine safety24th Jul 2017, 12:52 PM
503.503 - Studies show it is a bad idea. Stop doing the studies?25th Jul 2017, 10:38 AM
504.504 - Data sharing statements26th Jul 2017, 9:21 AM
505.505 - Anomalous anomaly maybe28th Jul 2017, 1:51 PM
506.506 - Citation counting heuristic29th Jul 2017, 2:56 PM
507.507 - A diagnosis that makes anxious31st Jul 2017, 4:54 PM
508.508 - We never retracted a study1st Aug 2017, 2:40 PM
509.509 - Post-hoc logic and inadequate theories2nd Aug 2017, 11:50 AM
510.510 - What does "could" mean for you?3rd Aug 2017, 11:16 AM
511.511 - If I could have a superpower...4th Aug 2017, 9:39 AM
512.512 - Let's play LEGO randomized trial5th Aug 2017, 10:07 AM
513.513 - The Science of Cookies is a pilot trial6th Aug 2017, 7:29 AM
514.514 - Based on poorer standards than the evidence you reject7th Aug 2017, 1:19 PM
515.515 - Strategies when searching for a differential diagnosis8th Aug 2017, 8:11 AM
516.516 - Reimbursed as a surrogate for effectiveness9th Aug 2017, 7:58 AM
517.517 - A matter of priorities10th Aug 2017, 1:11 PM
518.518 - Symptom checkers [Untranslated & Retracted]11th Aug 2017, 7:51 AM
519.519 - Searching with Pubmed Clinical Queries12th Aug 2017, 9:06 AM
520.520 - I can't do that without a computer program14th Aug 2017, 5:00 AM
521.521 - The CONSORT statement15th Aug 2017, 2:11 PM
522.522 - Experimental booklet16th Aug 2017, 8:37 AM
523.523 - Streamlining experimental research involving comics17th Aug 2017, 6:05 PM
524.524 - Ask your librarian18th Aug 2017, 11:51 AM
525.525 - Which source is it?20th Aug 2017, 2:26 PM
526.526 - Searching on the Tripdatabase21st Aug 2017, 7:13 AM
527.527 - Sources don't matter anyway!22nd Aug 2017, 3:59 PM
528.528 - Is it faster or better that you want?24th Aug 2017, 4:31 PM
529.529 - MORE NEW, NOW, NEED!25th Aug 2017, 7:50 PM
530.530 - Nudging colleagues to use EBP websites26th Aug 2017, 4:32 PM
531.531 - Classes on how to change your mind28th Aug 2017, 6:18 PM
532.532 - You can think of it with a probability29th Aug 2017, 6:08 PM
533.533 - Population level uncontrolled experiments30th Aug 2017, 11:43 AM
534.534 - Experimental devices in your body31st Aug 2017, 5:03 PM
535.535 - Where does this certificate come from?1st Sep 2017, 8:25 PM
536.536 - They forgot how to search the day before they learned2nd Sep 2017, 8:54 AM
537.537 - Using a diagnosis for profit4th Sep 2017, 4:28 PM
538.538 - The cause of death is only part of some stories5th Sep 2017, 5:02 PM
539.539 - Getting rid of the knowledge to practice gap6th Sep 2017, 4:38 PM
540.540 - Can you get this information without technology?7th Sep 2017, 4:23 PM
541.541 - Which scale to use to measure this?8th Sep 2017, 4:39 PM
542.542 - Copyright boundaries9th Sep 2017, 8:15 AM
543.543 - Trial registries said different things11th Sep 2017, 5:07 PM
544.544 - Disclose ALL risks to the study participants12th Sep 2017, 5:07 PM
545.545 - Explain your job to a 5 years old13th Sep 2017, 4:07 PM
546.546 - I have experience by proxy14th Sep 2017, 3:47 PM
547.547 - Is this PDF the most up-to-date version?15th Sep 2017, 4:57 PM
548.548 - Looking for magic16th Sep 2017, 8:15 PM
549.549 - Should we ask for consent?18th Sep 2017, 2:15 PM
550.550 - What will you do with this test result?19th Sep 2017, 5:52 PM

551-600

551.551 - Uncertainty was left to grow21st Sep 2017, 5:59 PM
552.552 - Nepotism among funders22nd Sep 2017, 9:06 PM
553.553 - Shorter manuscripts, shorter time until publication?23rd Sep 2017, 10:23 AM
554.554 - Give us immunity against getting sued24th Sep 2017, 2:23 PM
555.555 - Long-term treatment based on short-term data25th Sep 2017, 4:50 PM
556.556 - A preliminary diagnosis stayed for years26th Sep 2017, 8:35 PM
557.557 - Individual items matter when you assess study quality27th Sep 2017, 6:05 PM
558.558 - Long-term treatment for someone with a short prognosis28th Sep 2017, 4:21 PM
559.559 - Pointing out problems leads you to trouble30th Sep 2017, 7:10 AM
560.560 - A third of it is references anyway1st Oct 2017, 5:03 PM
561.561 - When you complete your studies the secret will be revealed2nd Oct 2017, 4:42 PM
562.562 - The diagnostic threshold will change only a little bit3rd Oct 2017, 7:24 PM
563.563 - How subjective can a fracture be?4th Oct 2017, 5:43 PM
564.564 - Unreported demographics5th Oct 2017, 4:17 PM
565.565 - Referrals were made thoughtfully6th Oct 2017, 7:10 PM
566.566 - Try checking everyting and you'll see the problem7th Oct 2017, 3:24 PM
567.567 - Publishers asked for my rights9th Oct 2017, 8:41 AM
568.568 - Evidence would make no difference10th Oct 2017, 8:26 AM
569.569 - How will you handle poor participant recruitment?11th Oct 2017, 9:04 AM
570.570 - Nobody wanted our "negative" journals12th Oct 2017, 8:59 AM
571.571 - Too many drawings13th Oct 2017, 8:50 AM
572.572 - Minimum article lenght explained13th Oct 2017, 8:52 AM
573.573 - Who needs to know what for shared decision making?14th Oct 2017, 7:39 AM
574.574 - The mechanism of action is "I don't have any idea"14th Oct 2017, 7:41 AM
575.575 - Highly effective at reducing [a risk]14th Oct 2017, 7:43 AM
576.576 - Predatory journals can be attractive15th Oct 2017, 8:00 PM
577.577 - Borderline gibberish15th Oct 2017, 8:02 PM
578.578 - Certainty of the evidence, what words did they use?15th Oct 2017, 8:04 PM
579.579 - Strategic control of potential study participants16th Oct 2017, 8:29 AM
580.580 - Conclusive results would be terrifying17th Oct 2017, 10:24 AM
581.581 - N-of-1 research and advanced directives [untranslated]18th Oct 2017, 9:16 AM
582.582 - Should we start all over again every single time?19th Oct 2017, 9:04 AM
583.583 - Scarcity can be opportunity20th Oct 2017, 8:37 AM
584.584 - Evidence does not speak for itself21st Oct 2017, 8:39 AM
585.585 - Statistical significance and clinical significance clash21st Oct 2017, 1:41 PM
586.586 - The error was corrected but only partly21st Oct 2017, 2:36 PM
587.587 - Poor study design or poorly used study design?22nd Oct 2017, 10:41 AM
588.588 - Great evidence but maybe a bit late23rd Oct 2017, 6:06 PM
589.589 - Pre-req for research24th Oct 2017, 5:35 PM
590.590 - Impossible standards25th Oct 2017, 9:23 PM
591.591 - Publish results within a year or else...26th Oct 2017, 4:21 PM
592.592 - Critical appraisal is to use sparingly27th Oct 2017, 4:21 PM
593.593 - We know results already28th Oct 2017, 3:54 PM
594.594 - Learning everything about medicine will take forever29th Oct 2017, 8:26 AM
595.595 - Giving to charities with what specific intentions?30th Oct 2017, 3:40 PM
596.596 - Explaining treatment options wasn't expected31st Oct 2017, 6:16 PM
597.597 - Please do research and good luck doing that1st Nov 2017, 4:30 PM
598.598 - Treatment rationale2nd Nov 2017, 4:04 PM
599.599 - Test to test some more4th Nov 2017, 2:31 PM
600.600 - Try assessing their methods5th Nov 2017, 2:35 PM

601-650

601.601 - Too much of a critique7th Nov 2017, 3:55 PM
602.602 - Cherry picking results7th Nov 2017, 3:58 PM
603.603 - Slowing growth surrogate measure8th Nov 2017, 11:46 AM
604.604 - "Studies", "studies", "studies", but what kind of studies?9th Nov 2017, 4:14 PM
605.605 - What part of the confidence interval did you look at?10th Nov 2017, 4:25 PM
606.606 - Results hidden in plain sight11th Nov 2017, 9:34 AM
607.607 - Screening for this disease stopped being useful12th Nov 2017, 5:30 PM
608.608 - We all have unfounded beliefs13th Nov 2017, 5:12 PM
609.609 - All experts can look stupid14th Nov 2017, 5:00 PM
610.610 - The ethics of NOT NOT doing research15th Nov 2017, 6:49 PM
611.611 - Research can be expensive16th Nov 2017, 4:47 PM
612.612 - Time spent learning stuff you won't need17th Nov 2017, 4:21 PM
613.613 - This unfair comparison was intended18th Nov 2017, 12:00 PM
614.614 - Survival isn't everything19th Nov 2017, 4:10 PM
615.615 - Shorten the medical curriculum (here, I've said it!)20th Nov 2017, 5:03 PM
616.616 - What does a doctor look like?21st Nov 2017, 5:42 PM
617.617 - Documentaries made to keep your attention21st Nov 2017, 5:45 PM
618.618 - Pragmatic lesson content22nd Nov 2017, 4:24 PM
619.619 - Knowing what doesn't work is only a step towards progress23rd Nov 2017, 5:11 PM
620.620 - Accuracy mattered not24th Nov 2017, 3:59 PM
621.621 - Flashcards from The Science of Cookies25th Nov 2017, 5:39 PM
622.622 - Numbers mean something26th Nov 2017, 1:49 PM
623.623 - Looking for research or looking for answers?27th Nov 2017, 5:34 PM
624.624 - Each lesson is part of a trial28th Nov 2017, 4:36 PM
625.625 - "Evidence based" what do you mean?28th Nov 2017, 4:38 PM
626.626 - Feedback excessively delayed28th Nov 2017, 4:40 PM
627.627 - Procrastinating spaced learning28th Nov 2017, 4:42 PM
628.628 - Try correcting a printed piece of paper29th Nov 2017, 5:12 PM
629.629 - Teach what is based on the most reliable evidence30th Nov 2017, 4:37 PM
630.630 - Pressuring for hope2nd Dec 2017, 2:18 PM
631.631 - What did this core outcome set become?3rd Dec 2017, 9:03 AM
632.632 - Treatment is effective given [conditions adequately followed]4th Dec 2017, 3:40 PM
633.633 - Can't be done until it has been done conundrum4th Dec 2017, 3:42 PM
634.634 - Studies cut into pieces and salami slicing4th Dec 2017, 3:43 PM
635.635 - Draw here5th Dec 2017, 5:52 PM
636.636 - What does it mean when a journal endorses something?5th Dec 2017, 5:54 PM
637.637 - Sue your enemy until he/she/they gives up6th Dec 2017, 4:39 PM
638.638 - Effectiveness is only a part of the decision7th Dec 2017, 3:44 PM
639.639 - Test to learn, test to teach8th Dec 2017, 4:50 PM
640.640 - Some topics get more funds than others8th Dec 2017, 4:51 PM
641.641 - What did this conference abstract become?8th Dec 2017, 4:53 PM
642.642 - Waiting on the ethics committee's decision8th Dec 2017, 4:54 PM
643.643 - Call your study what it actually is9th Dec 2017, 9:46 AM
644.644 - What's in it for me?10th Dec 2017, 12:11 PM
645.645 - Subtle conflicts of interests and good manners10th Dec 2017, 12:14 PM
646.646 - It doesn't work saves money10th Dec 2017, 12:16 PM
647.647 - Readers might benefit from a stop & think10th Dec 2017, 12:17 PM
648.648 - Do you need to read everything?10th Dec 2017, 12:20 PM
649.649 - Made too simple11th Dec 2017, 5:22 PM
650.650 - Surprising study exclusion criterias11th Dec 2017, 5:24 PM

651-700

651.651 - Known unknown variables12th Dec 2017, 9:20 PM
652.652 - Publishing study results could be easier13th Dec 2017, 4:38 PM
653.653 - Only a lifetime left to draw14th Dec 2017, 3:56 PM
654.654 - Evidence based practice does not have to be a one-man activity14th Dec 2017, 3:58 PM
655.655 - What is the purpose of giving you this diagnosis?15th Dec 2017, 4:51 PM
656.656 - A treatment is on the horizon (but you shouldn't expect it)16th Dec 2017, 8:06 PM
657.657 - Keeping track of what I read17th Dec 2017, 3:48 PM
658.658 - Kill what's sacred17th Dec 2017, 3:51 PM
659.659 - It might take a number of books before you find this insight18th Dec 2017, 5:55 PM
660.660 - EBM Bulletin boards within hospitals19th Dec 2017, 5:02 PM
661.661 - Incidental findings and their prognosis20th Dec 2017, 6:49 PM
662.662 - Bad news, you will die21st Dec 2017, 6:10 PM
663.663 - Excellence within the team22nd Dec 2017, 3:41 PM
664.664 - Governments depending on industry23rd Dec 2017, 3:33 PM
665.665 - How do the comics relate to eachother?24th Dec 2017, 10:00 AM
666.666 - Screening until the end of times24th Dec 2017, 10:01 AM
667.667 - New points of views welcome (or not)24th Dec 2017, 10:03 AM
668.668 - Standards differ between fields of research25th Dec 2017, 2:12 PM
669.669 - Likelihood ratios (LRs), what are they for?26th Dec 2017, 7:09 PM
670.670 - Analyze until you get what you want27th Dec 2017, 9:43 AM
671.671 - Entry tests killed innovators27th Dec 2017, 9:45 AM
672.672 - Fake conferences, true costs27th Dec 2017, 9:50 AM
673.673 - Sustainable changes of practices28th Dec 2017, 9:10 AM
674.674 - On the many ways to analyze data28th Dec 2017, 9:12 AM
675.675 - Make it look rubbish to publish in rubbish journals?28th Dec 2017, 9:16 AM
676.676 - Why did you learn science?28th Dec 2017, 9:19 AM
677.677 - Only so much you can do with limited continuing education28th Dec 2017, 9:25 AM
678.678 - Remove outliers and run the test again28th Dec 2017, 9:27 AM
679.679 - Unequal author contributions29th Dec 2017, 9:21 AM
680.680 - Algorithms are biased29th Dec 2017, 9:22 AM
681.681 - Investing in what you decide to read29th Dec 2017, 9:23 AM
682.682 - "Non-significant" side effects go unreported29th Dec 2017, 9:25 AM
683.683 - Regular practice of EBP is required29th Dec 2017, 9:27 AM
684.684 - Unusual skillsets30th Dec 2017, 12:02 PM
685.685 - Exploratory analysis and forking paths30th Dec 2017, 12:03 PM
686.686 - Jargon strikes again30th Dec 2017, 12:04 PM
687.687 - Making thoughts on research articles public (journal clubs)30th Dec 2017, 12:06 PM
688.688 - I went to a predatory conference, now what?1st Jan 2018, 3:30 PM
689.689 - A culture against errors incentivizes secrecy2nd Jan 2018, 12:29 PM
690.690 - Broaden your searches3rd Jan 2018, 12:34 PM
691.691 - Rhetorics can trump evidence4th Jan 2018, 9:03 AM
692.692 - Automatically flawed analysis5th Jan 2018, 9:27 AM
693.693 - What matters to ethics committees?6th Jan 2018, 11:10 AM
694.694 - Information specialists, the great knowledge organizers7th Jan 2018, 7:35 AM
695.695 - Librarians coming on rounds7th Jan 2018, 7:37 AM
696.696 - Life is an experiment8th Jan 2018, 4:26 PM
697.697 - I'll stay in this trial by all means8th Jan 2018, 4:28 PM
698.698 - Is curiosity reason enough?8th Jan 2018, 4:30 PM
699.699 - Alerted on new publications8th Jan 2018, 4:32 PM
700.700 - In the event of too much good evidence you should ______9th Jan 2018, 5:17 PM

701-750

701.701 - The cult of continuing education10th Jan 2018, 5:07 PM
702.702 - Excessively specific guidelines11th Jan 2018, 5:05 PM
703.703 - Test results depend on experience with the test12th Jan 2018, 6:35 AM
704.704 - Survival at 5 years13th Jan 2018, 7:33 AM
705.705 - What are French researchers citing when they do?13th Jan 2018, 12:01 PM
706.706 - Train rides as teaching/drawing/learning opportunities14th Jan 2018, 1:02 PM
707.707 - I work alone to work evidence-based14th Jan 2018, 1:03 PM
708.708 - Thank you for doing nothing15th Jan 2018, 5:16 PM
709.709 - Obsolete by default16th Jan 2018, 6:43 AM
710.710 - Researchers will game your metrics17th Jan 2018, 5:09 PM
711.711 - When guideline developers don't want to make people angry18th Jan 2018, 4:05 PM
712.712 - Systematic reviews: Selective versus routine episiotomies for vaginal birth CD00008119th Jan 2018, 3:16 PM
713.713 - Train recall22nd Jan 2018, 6:20 PM
714.714 - The cheapeast study design we will select23rd Jan 2018, 5:30 PM
715.715 - 50 journals a day is enough24th Jan 2018, 12:06 PM
716.716 - Which sources of information are you using (comics interpretation)25th Jan 2018, 6:32 PM
717.717 - Exclusion criterias were chosen at random25th Jan 2018, 6:36 PM
718.718 - When systematic reviews disagree with eachother26th Jan 2018, 3:45 PM
719.719 - Additional files are available online27th Jan 2018, 12:51 PM
720.720 - Conceptual study reproduction27th Jan 2018, 12:53 PM
721.721 - What would be a perfect study?27th Jan 2018, 12:55 PM
722.722 - Who followed the manual?27th Jan 2018, 12:58 PM
723.723 - I am not an evidence based practitioner27th Jan 2018, 1:00 PM
724.724 - Peer reviewers had expertise, but which kind of expertise?27th Jan 2018, 1:04 PM
725.725 - I will teach you how to prove magic with research27th Jan 2018, 1:06 PM
726.726 - Ask an outsider28th Jan 2018, 5:58 PM
727.727 - Authors made something simple excessively complicated29th Jan 2018, 5:18 PM
728.728 - More studies and improved knowledge are different things29th Jan 2018, 5:20 PM
729.729 - Clinical question answering services30th Jan 2018, 4:55 PM
730.730 - A costly search strategy31st Jan 2018, 6:53 PM
731.731 - Doubt is mandatory1st Feb 2018, 4:04 PM
732.732 - Looking for errors is still looking for errors2nd Feb 2018, 4:01 PM
733.733 - "Prove it does not fail" did not sound fundable3rd Feb 2018, 8:38 PM
734.734 - Pretest questions4th Feb 2018, 9:07 PM
735.735 - Compare with useless and claim effectiveness5th Feb 2018, 4:22 PM
736.736 - "We followed the CONSORT checklist"6th Feb 2018, 6:31 AM
737.737 - I'll need a couple clones to keep up7th Feb 2018, 6:38 PM
738.738 - Checklist appraisal killed details8th Feb 2018, 4:47 PM
739.739 - Conflicting recommendations9th Feb 2018, 4:23 PM
740.740 - Diagnos-biased10th Feb 2018, 7:51 AM
741.741 - On the day French and English met11th Feb 2018, 2:07 PM
742.742 - Systematic reviews are easy to do they say12th Feb 2018, 5:01 PM
743.743 - Negative results are welcome over here13th Feb 2018, 5:35 PM
744.744 - Ignore all poor research strategy14th Feb 2018, 9:53 PM
745.745 - Highly satisfied patients15th Feb 2018, 3:56 PM
746.746 - Time wasted doing things for no good reasons16th Feb 2018, 4:08 PM
747.747 - What would you do without _______?17th Feb 2018, 6:14 PM
748.748 - Selective drawings to foster curiosity18th Feb 2018, 12:15 PM
749.749 - A well-known author18th Feb 2018, 12:18 PM
750.750 - The Science of Cookies file drawer19th Feb 2018, 10:51 AM

751-800

751.751 - Arbitrary inclusion criterias19th Feb 2018, 10:58 AM
752.752 - The Science of Cookies is not available unless...19th Feb 2018, 11:03 AM
753.753 - Wait there is already a study ongoing19th Feb 2018, 11:08 AM
754.754 - The first step of evidence based medicine (EBM)20th Feb 2018, 8:12 AM
755.755 - Double-checking experts to build confidence21st Feb 2018, 9:02 AM
756.756 - Teaching evidence based medicine (EBM) whenever we can22nd Feb 2018, 3:07 PM
757.757 - Give me time for research and I will know about research23rd Feb 2018, 12:42 PM
758.758 - 85% of biomedical research might be wasted, what does it mean?24th Feb 2018, 6:15 PM
759.759 - If treatment cost was based on effect alone25th Feb 2018, 3:18 PM
760.760 - Indirect learning26th Feb 2018, 3:57 PM
761.761 - Everything shall be redacted27th Feb 2018, 6:20 AM
762.762 - Unreliable results but reliable data28th Feb 2018, 6:32 AM
763.763 - Rapid research and implementation priority setting for wound care uncertainties1st Mar 2018, 6:28 AM
764.764 - Etablissement des priorités de recherche pour les incertitudes relatives aux soins de plaies [Translation=comic 763]2nd Mar 2018, 9:28 PM
765.765 - This alternative treatment is pretty standard3rd Mar 2018, 1:09 PM
766.766 - Collaborate with the strongest opponent3rd Mar 2018, 1:11 PM
767.767 - Biased continuing education3rd Mar 2018, 1:12 PM
768.768 - Significant by the comma4th Mar 2018, 12:49 PM
769.769 - Who will ever notice?5th Mar 2018, 6:29 AM
770.770 - Subjectivity won't disappear6th Mar 2018, 6:28 AM
771.771 - Alternative explanations7th Mar 2018, 6:30 AM
772.772 - Excessively anonymous data7th Mar 2018, 6:35 AM
773.773 - Spread things out or keep things in one place?8th Mar 2018, 6:33 AM
774.774 - Time well spent9th Mar 2018, 6:28 AM
775.775 - Not looking for alternatives anymore10th Mar 2018, 12:05 PM
776.776 - International catalogue of visual explanations10th Mar 2018, 12:07 PM
777.777 - Should you incentivize pointing out errors in the comics?10th Mar 2018, 12:09 PM
778.778 - When a diagnosis died down11th Mar 2018, 7:38 AM
779.779 - Guidelines should tell you useful things12th Mar 2018, 6:34 AM
780.780 - The more expensive the better I am12th Mar 2018, 6:39 AM
781.781 - Online disclosures of conflicts of interests13th Mar 2018, 6:38 AM
782.782 - Checklist used differently depending on prior beliefs14th Mar 2018, 6:37 AM
783.783 - Spurious associations15th Mar 2018, 6:35 AM
784.784 - Do my colleagues know about evidence based medicine?16th Mar 2018, 6:36 AM
785.785 - Use Wikipedia17th Mar 2018, 1:47 PM
786.786 - It took some time to typeset the manuscript18th Mar 2018, 1:57 PM
787.787 - It's not in a scientific journal19th Mar 2018, 6:45 AM
788.788 - A "small" contribution to this research20th Mar 2018, 6:43 AM
789.789 - Every day is full of qualitative data21st Mar 2018, 6:32 AM
790.790 - Country-specific effects or fantasy?22nd Mar 2018, 6:35 AM
791.791 - What is missing from this study report?22nd Mar 2018, 6:37 AM
792.792 - Who's ready to wait for good evidence on comics?23rd Mar 2018, 6:34 AM
793.793 - The ethics of contradictory effects24th Mar 2018, 1:29 PM
794.794 - Hide random things for no good reasons24th Mar 2018, 1:31 PM
795.795 - The Science of Cookies big red button24th Mar 2018, 1:33 PM
796.796 - Everything is statistically significant25th Mar 2018, 8:14 AM
797.797 - This illustration was done with no help26th Mar 2018, 6:37 AM
798.798 - Weekly EBM quizzes27th Mar 2018, 6:34 AM
799.799 - Revues systématiques : Le recours sélectif à l'épisiotomie par rapport au recours systématique pour l'accouchement par voie basse CD000081 [Translation=comic 712]28th Mar 2018, 8:00 AM
800.800 - Not citing for political purposes29th Mar 2018, 6:42 AM

801-850

801.801 - Which steps of your complex intervention are based on strong evidence?30th Mar 2018, 10:32 AM
802.802 - It took some time to correct31st Mar 2018, 8:35 AM
803.803 - It is good we know about unreliable studies1st Apr 2018, 8:18 AM
804.804 - Research regulations are supposed to work2nd Apr 2018, 10:24 AM
805.805 - I prefer to know I don't know3rd Apr 2018, 10:58 AM
806.806 - Views and website visitors are surrogate measures of impact4th Apr 2018, 12:02 PM
807.807 - Clinical epidemiology comics, sure!4th Apr 2018, 12:05 PM
808.808 - A bachelor thesis we don't want to see5th Apr 2018, 12:58 PM
809.809 - Simulate developing a guideline6th Apr 2018, 9:25 AM
810.810 - Citing studies can be a form of art7th Apr 2018, 8:05 AM
811.811 - Too many steps to trust the mechanism8th Apr 2018, 3:52 PM
812.812 - My job is taking care of myself9th Apr 2018, 9:41 AM
813.813 - A key study element was missing, maybe the most important one10th Apr 2018, 7:41 AM
814.814 - Maybe this comic meant something else11th Apr 2018, 4:13 PM
815.815 - My life is typical12th Apr 2018, 3:37 PM
816.816 - Good evidence will appear, eventually14th Apr 2018, 8:51 AM
817.817 - An army of potential researchers wasting their time15th Apr 2018, 9:22 AM
818.818 - Core Health Outcomes In Childhood Epilepsy (CHOICE): Core Outcomes Set selection study protocol [Translation available online]16th Apr 2018, 6:34 AM
819.819 - Methods are reported in a previous publication17th Apr 2018, 3:47 PM
820.820 - Why are you teaching people to find poor evidence?18th Apr 2018, 9:50 PM
821.821 - Failproof references19th Apr 2018, 8:41 PM
822.822 - We only have 10 hours to write this guideline20th Apr 2018, 4:22 PM
823.823 - Who has more time for research?21st Apr 2018, 9:34 PM
824.824 - Few words difference, large difference (search strategy)22nd Apr 2018, 4:02 PM
825.825 - Enthusiastically not participating in this research23rd Apr 2018, 5:38 PM
826.826 - Conflicts o-24th Apr 2018, 5:38 PM
827.827 - All study risks were considered25th Apr 2018, 5:55 PM
828.828 - How much of an exhaustive search was this?26th Apr 2018, 4:36 PM
829.829 - This reviewer has expertise27th Apr 2018, 4:29 PM
830.830 - Asking for the unknown28th Apr 2018, 3:51 PM
831.831 - Psychometric tests involve subjectivity [Untranslated]29th Apr 2018, 6:27 AM
832.832 - Score range unknown30th Apr 2018, 6:29 AM
833.833 - They learned the theory very well1st May 2018, 6:01 PM
834.834 - Guidelines can't involve everyone2nd May 2018, 4:59 PM
835.835 - "I won't publish in a scientific journal" he said3rd May 2018, 4:11 PM
836.836 - He published something new on his wall4th May 2018, 5:16 PM
837.837 - Children are your only chance5th May 2018, 9:57 PM
838.838 - What research is taking place in my hospital?6th May 2018, 3:00 PM
839.839 - Teach someone how to do a randomized trial and...7th May 2018, 6:13 PM
840.840 - Practices are heterogeneous8th May 2018, 5:17 PM
841.841 - Mom asked for this research9th May 2018, 2:17 PM
842.842 - Certificate or skills?10th May 2018, 1:34 PM
843.843 - The day TV series show up-to-date practices12th May 2018, 8:53 AM
844.844 - It's only a small study detail13th May 2018, 5:53 PM
845.845 - Non-standardized patient information leaflets14th May 2018, 4:22 PM
846.846 - How reliable were their diagnostic assessments?16th May 2018, 5:17 PM
847.847 - Better not to tell them17th May 2018, 4:20 PM
848.848 - Make it more complicated to hide things18th May 2018, 4:36 PM
849.849 - Clinical epidemiology illustrator19th May 2018, 4:04 PM
850.850 - Aggregated n-of-1 trials of central nervous system stimulants versus placebo for paediatric traumatic brain injury20th May 2018, 1:35 PM

851-900

851.851 - You won't find the answer if you don't ask again21st May 2018, 1:14 PM
852.852 - Results so good they appear unlikely22nd May 2018, 4:15 PM
853.853 - Computer tools to make research easy23rd May 2018, 5:15 PM
854.854 - The editorial board has the power24th May 2018, 4:49 PM
855.855 - Measurement scales disagreement25th May 2018, 6:53 AM
856.856 - Everyone knows what "treatment as usual" means26th May 2018, 5:10 PM
857.857 - Academia clinical practice false dichotomy27th May 2018, 1:14 PM
858.858 - How was this treatment called confusion28th May 2018, 5:27 PM
859.859 - N-of-1 trials interest group29th May 2018, 6:33 PM
860.860 - Waiting for perfect evidence30th May 2018, 9:48 PM
861.861 - First authorship wars31st May 2018, 6:29 AM
862.862 - Contact the study authors1st Jun 2018, 5:20 PM
863.863 - Les stimulants du système nerveux central par rapport à des placebos pour les traumatismes crâniens chez les enfants : essais individuels (n-of-1) combinés [Translation=comic 850]2nd Jun 2018, 1:31 PM
864.864 - Recommendations, not rules3rd Jun 2018, 1:38 PM
865.865 - Research is too slow4th Jun 2018, 5:41 PM
866.866 - EBM Cursus vitae unreadable to most5th Jun 2018, 6:46 AM
867.867 - Counting publications, count, count, count6th Jun 2018, 4:32 PM
868.868 - We should measure just one more thing...7th Jun 2018, 4:51 PM
869.869 - Evidence champions8th Jun 2018, 5:46 PM
870.870 - Corrupt the comics through feedbacks10th Jun 2018, 7:10 AM
871.871 - Industry gifts, be wary!11th Jun 2018, 6:32 AM
872.872 - Best not to12th Jun 2018, 3:37 PM
873.873 - Pick an evidence based profession... if you can?13th Jun 2018, 2:26 PM
874.874 - Colleagues' claims are based on...14th Jun 2018, 5:10 PM
875.875 - John PA Ioannidis Research waste Taboo card16th Jun 2018, 10:44 AM
876.876 - Collaboration is the future (past)16th Jun 2018, 10:47 AM
877.877 - Reading research killed their morale17th Jun 2018, 10:53 AM
878.878 - Cut training into pieces and find the useful ones18th Jun 2018, 4:56 PM
879.879 - Multicenter trial regulations19th Jun 2018, 5:25 PM
880.880 - Too few participants to do anything20th Jun 2018, 8:41 PM
881.881 - Open to criticisms when it benefits us22nd Jun 2018, 4:02 PM
882.882 - Research skills matter to those who understand them24th Jun 2018, 1:16 PM
883.883 - Pubmed AND operator25th Jun 2018, 8:49 PM
884.884 - Stop explaining your work, researchers!26th Jun 2018, 4:53 PM
885.885 - How much imperfect is okay?27th Jun 2018, 8:58 PM
886.886 - Errare author est29th Jun 2018, 4:11 PM
887.887 - Lateral recovery position [Untranslated & Retracted]30th Jun 2018, 7:55 PM
888.888 - Kill my enthusiasm if it gets excessive1st Jul 2018, 12:58 PM
889.889 - How many research questions per day per patient?2nd Jul 2018, 5:49 PM
890.890 - An excessively well-known study2nd Jul 2018, 5:51 PM
891.891 - A highly selective journal it would appear3rd Jul 2018, 8:22 PM
892.892 - The way of cheaters4th Jul 2018, 3:33 PM
893.893 - The future will be different, but how different?5th Jul 2018, 4:15 PM
894.894 - The last explorers9th Jul 2018, 2:59 PM
895.895 - Logic is overrated10th Jul 2018, 6:47 AM
896.896 - Certificates can mean many things11th Jul 2018, 1:13 PM
897.897 - Who likes to be the downer?12th Jul 2018, 7:50 AM
898.898 - They couldn't have known12th Jul 2018, 7:53 AM
899.899 - This study will end up published no matter what12th Jul 2018, 7:55 AM
900.900 - Research is "only research"13th Jul 2018, 8:20 AM

901-950

901.901 - Website aesthetics stopped being a criteria for poor scientific journals13th Jul 2018, 8:22 AM
902.902 - No good alternatives14th Jul 2018, 7:29 AM
903.903 - It works this way, currently at least (mechanisms of action)15th Jul 2018, 9:43 AM
904.904 - Give me a reason to have study registries16th Jul 2018, 11:41 AM
905.905 - How costly will it become to stop you from doing this in X years?18th Jul 2018, 4:38 PM
906.906 - The first study on the subject is not the end of it all19th Jul 2018, 12:15 PM
907.907 - How to foster a research culture in your ward20th Jul 2018, 11:18 AM
908.908 - Tell students about bad research or don't tell students?21st Jul 2018, 11:43 AM
909.909 - I know lots but maybe I know little22nd Jul 2018, 11:46 AM
910.910 - Some are talented at killing research efforts23rd Jul 2018, 11:48 AM
911.911 - Evidence is available to everyone, you only need wifi24th Jul 2018, 11:50 AM
912.912 - "Together we are stronger" is easy to say25th Jul 2018, 11:52 AM
913.913 - (mis)targeted health screening26th Jul 2018, 11:54 AM
914.914 - Evidence Based Practice shortcut27th Jul 2018, 11:57 AM
915.915 - Stopping poor research illustrators?28th Jul 2018, 9:09 PM
916.916 - Please teach me clinical epidemiology29th Jul 2018, 7:19 AM
917.917 - The best statistical test in this situation is...30th Jul 2018, 12:44 PM
918.918 - It is not only a checklist exercise, think!31st Jul 2018, 12:46 PM
919.919 - A major problem somewhere somewhere1st Aug 2018, 12:48 PM
920.920 - There is always something to improve mindset2nd Aug 2018, 12:51 PM
921.921 - First you need peers to peer-review3rd Aug 2018, 12:53 PM
922.922 - Fragmented research ideas4th Aug 2018, 12:55 PM
923.923 - The Science of Cookies must NOT stay current5th Aug 2018, 12:57 PM
924.924 - Barrier to criticizing The Science of Cookies6th Aug 2018, 12:59 PM
925.925 - Make it more expensive7th Aug 2018, 1:01 PM
926.926 - "Must use research"8th Aug 2018, 1:03 PM
927.927 - No evidence vs it doesn't work9th Aug 2018, 1:05 PM
928.928 - Gifts from the industry do not influence mypractice10th Aug 2018, 1:06 PM
929.929 - Best or only option known to work?11th Aug 2018, 1:08 PM
930.930 - Compulsory reading I suggest not12th Aug 2018, 1:10 PM
931.931 - Trained as a research illustrator, really?13th Aug 2018, 10:04 AM
932.932 - Cost-effectiveness correlation?14th Aug 2018, 10:36 AM
933.933 - Who are you, curious readers?14th Aug 2018, 2:57 PM
934.934 - Treatment and indication creep15th Aug 2018, 11:17 AM
935.935 - What is the most important study to draw?16th Aug 2018, 1:00 PM
936.936 - There is never enough training16th Aug 2018, 1:15 PM
937.937 - Pre-diagnosis, pre-diseases16th Aug 2018, 1:21 PM
938.938 - Nobody draws health recommendations, dissemination idea17th Aug 2018, 8:50 AM
939.939 - Evidence Based Medicine symbols17th Aug 2018, 8:59 AM
940.940 - Anyone can illustrate research studies18th Aug 2018, 8:48 AM
941.941 - There is more thought in this than might appear18th Aug 2018, 9:00 AM
942.942 - Exposing lies exposes people19th Aug 2018, 7:55 AM
943.943 Overdiagnosis illustration [EN & FR]20th Aug 2018, 5:58 AM
944.944 - Using technology because we can21st Aug 2018, 5:06 PM
945.945 - Once revealed never concealed22nd Aug 2018, 9:55 AM
946.946 - Don't use this statistical test23rd Aug 2018, 10:00 AM
947.947 - What are you measuring with this scale?24th Aug 2018, 11:16 AM
948.948 - Over a million drawings later25th Aug 2018, 9:31 AM
949.949 - Interrupted thoughts25th Aug 2018, 9:35 AM
950.950 - Comics have a fatal weakness26th Aug 2018, 1:22 PM

951-1000

951.951 - Clinical trial report vs study report27th Aug 2018, 6:03 AM
952.952 - Learning to read research comics28th Aug 2018, 1:32 PM
953.953 - Use judgment28th Aug 2018, 1:39 PM
954.954 - A journal for everyone29th Aug 2018, 11:24 AM
955.955 - Unknown unknowns again30th Aug 2018, 9:54 AM
956.956 - Suggesting improvements, who can do that?31st Aug 2018, 12:39 PM
957.957 - Inertia and traditions2nd Sep 2018, 12:21 PM
958.958 - What should the drawings focus on?3rd Sep 2018, 2:04 PM
959.959 - Shortcuts were used to decide who got funding4th Sep 2018, 11:41 AM
960.960 - We identified fraud and then we don't say5th Sep 2018, 6:37 PM
961.961 - Symbols used may matter6th Sep 2018, 2:42 PM
962.962 - Episode 2009, 85% of biomedical research is a waste6th Sep 2018, 2:47 PM
963.963 - This is too long, this is too short7th Sep 2018, 1:31 PM
964.964 - Deprescribing yes but I need some details7th Sep 2018, 1:34 PM
965.965 - It took me a year to write a 1-hour review10th Sep 2018, 2:59 PM
966.966 - Comics reading group10th Sep 2018, 3:02 PM
967.967 - Treatment advocacy gone wrong11th Sep 2018, 9:53 PM
968.968 - High risk, high reward projects12th Sep 2018, 9:57 AM
969.969 - Data sharing is easy when colleagues are involved24th Sep 2018, 10:02 AM
970.970 - MY DATA, MINE, PRECIOUS!25th Sep 2018, 11:04 AM
971.971 - It doesn't have to be personal26th Sep 2018, 4:40 PM
972.972 - Indirect funding27th Sep 2018, 10:55 AM
973.973 - Funding will come later28th Sep 2018, 1:07 PM
974.974 - Keep it simple, keep it cleaner than real1st Oct 2018, 11:05 AM
975.975 - Build a positive relationship with authors2nd Oct 2018, 3:48 PM
976.976 - Did it not happen? Or was it not reported?3rd Oct 2018, 4:54 PM
977.977 - Intentional errors included4th Oct 2018, 10:03 AM
978.978 - I'll do good science later, I promise5th Oct 2018, 2:12 PM
979.979 - Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: a scoping review8th Oct 2018, 10:02 AM
980.980 - Qualitative data [n980]9th Oct 2018, 1:48 PM
981.981 - Reviewer 1 asked for it9th Oct 2018, 1:50 PM
982.982 - Too abstract to be taught, really?10th Oct 2018, 1:09 PM
983.983 - History repeats itself11th Oct 2018, 1:45 PM
984.984 - Work within the system or build a new one11th Oct 2018, 1:48 PM
985.985 - Did you consider [Important Issues] in your study?11th Oct 2018, 1:50 PM
986.986 - Access to the literature is a meter away12th Oct 2018, 12:30 PM
987.987 - Correct the literature but start elsewhere12th Oct 2018, 12:34 PM
988.988 - Research what you can?13th Oct 2018, 12:11 PM
989.989 - Frustration flows into the comics15th Oct 2018, 10:47 AM
990.990 - Contradictory feedback15th Oct 2018, 10:51 AM
991.991 - Only fund the best projects, now that's easy to say15th Oct 2018, 10:55 AM
992.992 - MORE GUIDELINES!!!15th Oct 2018, 11:00 AM
993.993 - Clear for whom?15th Oct 2018, 11:02 AM
994.994 - Incoming disasters17th Oct 2018, 2:17 PM
995.995 - Defend scientists, defend the search for Truth17th Oct 2018, 2:21 PM
996.996 - A couple more references to add17th Oct 2018, 2:24 PM
997.997 - An old idea: Scientific studies to communicate research17th Oct 2018, 2:28 PM
998.998 - Unsatisfied people flawing your trial17th Oct 2018, 2:31 PM
999.999 - This illustration came too early18th Oct 2018, 9:39 AM
1000.1000 - I won't be there forever, nor will my skills19th Oct 2018, 2:58 PM

1001-1050

1001.1001 - Expensive research but good too?20th Oct 2018, 1:11 PM
1002.1002 - Hiding plagiarism in plain sight21st Oct 2018, 8:46 AM
1003.1003 - Research is fun depends on how you contribute22nd Oct 2018, 2:00 PM
1004.1004 - At some point maybe I should stop for the benefit of all23rd Oct 2018, 1:29 PM
1005.1005 - Prove you can draw this!25th Oct 2018, 10:44 PM
1006.1006 - Too much of an expert to have a say26th Oct 2018, 4:23 PM
1007.1007 - The selection of assessors was biased28th Oct 2018, 4:53 PM
1008.1008 - Research knowledge is (potential) power29th Oct 2018, 8:03 PM
1009.1009 - Discoveries rest on one or many30th Oct 2018, 4:46 PM
1010.1010 - Indirect side effect31st Oct 2018, 7:59 PM
1011.1011 - Let us show you the value of research!1st Nov 2018, 8:32 PM
1012.1012 - Quickly done or poorly done?2nd Nov 2018, 1:36 PM
1013.1013 - This artist just failed5th Nov 2018, 5:41 PM
1014.1014 - Overbooked with diagnoses6th Nov 2018, 12:42 PM
1015.1015 - Recruitment was slow6th Nov 2018, 12:45 PM
1016.1016 - Old studies or old studies?7th Nov 2018, 12:50 PM
1017.1017 - He/She/They won't collaborate8th Nov 2018, 2:43 PM
1018.1018 - Unrelated answers13th Nov 2018, 12:27 PM
1019.1019 - Dodging conflicts of interests is a challenge13th Nov 2018, 12:30 PM
1020.1020 - You will need a certificate. Maybe13th Nov 2018, 12:33 PM
1021.1021 - First to act responsibly14th Nov 2018, 1:35 PM
1022.1022 - Asking questions with answers you might not understand15th Nov 2018, 9:20 AM
1023.1023 - Can't dedicate this life to comics19th Nov 2018, 2:42 PM
1024.1024 - I hear voices and they tell me "IMPROVE THIS"19th Nov 2018, 3:02 PM
1025.1025 - Illustrators shielding themselves from industry biases20th Nov 2018, 6:19 PM
1026.1026 - Use as you see fit21st Nov 2018, 1:23 PM
1027.1027 - When is it too young to learn this?21st Nov 2018, 1:26 PM
1028.1028 - Combining comics22nd Nov 2018, 11:26 AM
1029.1029 - Poor study illustration22nd Nov 2018, 11:29 AM
1030.1030 - Treasures anyone has access to22nd Nov 2018, 11:34 AM
1031.1031 - How much do you really want to know about this study?23rd Nov 2018, 2:32 PM
1032.1032 - Learning is breathing27th Nov 2018, 1:20 PM
1033.1033 - A good story or a scientific story?27th Nov 2018, 1:22 PM
1034.1034 - Printing research comics on your walls29th Nov 2018, 6:49 AM
1035.1035 - Anyone can comment this illustration30th Nov 2018, 7:47 AM
1036.1036 - Randomised controlled trial explained in a brochure [Untranslated]3rd Dec 2018, 2:17 PM
1037.1037 - Predicting what people will do with this tool3rd Dec 2018, 2:22 PM
1038.1038 - Participant coercion (unvoluntary)3rd Dec 2018, 2:25 PM
1039.1039 - Feedback > gold3rd Dec 2018, 2:28 PM
1040.1040 - Is this for university/school?5th Dec 2018, 5:10 PM
1041.1041 - A matter of outcome interpretation5th Dec 2018, 5:12 PM
1042.1042 - A comic for the primary investigator6th Dec 2018, 2:25 PM
1043.1043 - Research escape room6th Dec 2018, 2:34 PM
1044.1044 - Stats door guardian6th Dec 2018, 2:38 PM
1045.1045 - Join the study or else...6th Dec 2018, 2:41 PM
1046.1046 - Adventure book: Clinical trials6th Dec 2018, 2:44 PM
1047.1047 - Trial design7th Dec 2018, 6:46 PM
1048.1048 - Prevention and management of unprofessional behaviour among adults in the workplace10th Dec 2018, 10:14 AM
1049.1049 - Self regulation11th Dec 2018, 1:30 PM
1050.1050 - Textbook intros gotta be positive12th Dec 2018, 8:47 PM

1051-1100

1051.1051 - This is a bad source because we say so17th Dec 2018, 8:12 AM
1052.1052 - Ghost authors17th Dec 2018, 8:13 AM
1053.1053 - Expert in explaining how it ought to work17th Dec 2018, 8:14 AM
1054.1054 - Without us you have no power!17th Dec 2018, 8:17 AM
1055.1055 - Study status: progress18th Dec 2018, 11:28 AM
1056.1056 - Pseudoscience is mandatory19th Dec 2018, 3:17 PM
1057.1057 - Public and not so public comments19th Dec 2018, 3:20 PM
1058.1058 - Important things first... who will be first author?23rd Dec 2018, 3:35 PM
1059.1059 - Miranda whatever warning23rd Dec 2018, 3:37 PM
1060.1060 - The more you read the less you read23rd Dec 2018, 3:41 PM
1061.1061 - Nudge, nudge, nudge, nudge, nudge, do open science24th Dec 2018, 3:31 PM
1062.1062 - Flawed by well-meaning individuals25th Dec 2018, 2:34 PM
1063.1063 - But why backgrounds?27th Dec 2018, 12:59 PM
1064.1064 - Realistic backgrounds, yey or nay?27th Dec 2018, 1:02 PM
1065.1065 - Find the 7 differences and be attentive to details27th Dec 2018, 1:05 PM
1066.1066 - Science corrects itself when?27th Dec 2018, 1:08 PM
1067.1067 - Thinking about you27th Dec 2018, 1:11 PM
1068.1068 - Ancients' wisdom27th Dec 2018, 1:14 PM
1069.1069 - Science is a team activity27th Dec 2018, 1:16 PM
1070.1070 - Feasibility is a concern28th Dec 2018, 12:04 PM
1071.1071 - Everyone can peer-review29th Dec 2018, 3:28 PM
1072.1072 - EBM Rally30th Dec 2018, 3:07 PM
1073.1073 - So they have holidays too...30th Dec 2018, 3:13 PM
1074.1074 - It takes longer to assess than to create30th Dec 2018, 3:15 PM
1075.1075 - This theory needs to die1st Jan 2019, 2:17 PM
1076.1076 - A well-meaning teaching strategy1st Jan 2019, 2:20 PM
1077.1077 - An ivory tower far away2nd Jan 2019, 10:50 AM
1078.1078 - We don't like innovation2nd Jan 2019, 10:55 AM
1079.1079 - Important but too complicated3rd Jan 2019, 8:57 PM
1080.1080 - Privacy helps3rd Jan 2019, 9:01 PM
1081.1081 - Not failing enough4th Jan 2019, 8:49 PM
1082.1082 - If everyone was a researcher we could...5th Jan 2019, 9:34 PM
1083.1083 - Longer life or better life?6th Jan 2019, 1:08 PM
1084.1084 - They didn't reply to my emails7th Jan 2019, 5:04 PM
1085.1085 - Importance varies7th Jan 2019, 5:07 PM
1086.1086 - Supporting core ideas of research8th Jan 2019, 3:56 PM
1087.1087 - Survival analysis of readers9th Jan 2019, 12:39 PM
1088.1088 - What is the least you should draw?10th Jan 2019, 10:10 AM
1089.1089 - Lead-time bias10th Jan 2019, 10:14 AM
1090.1090 - Pubmed search game10th Jan 2019, 10:20 AM
1091.1091 - Munchkin inspired research card game10th Jan 2019, 10:26 AM
1092.1092 - Some comics ought to be bad11th Jan 2019, 10:00 AM
1093.1093 - Rediscovered 30 years later14th Jan 2019, 7:23 PM
1094.1094 - Looking for uncertainty15th Jan 2019, 6:25 PM
1095.1095 - Conflicts not sought, not reported17th Jan 2019, 10:27 AM
1096.1096 - How do you check my conflicts?17th Jan 2019, 11:02 AM
1097.1097 - Bring more context18th Jan 2019, 10:08 PM
1098.1098 - Idea builder21st Jan 2019, 9:59 PM
1099.1099 - "Core" journals22nd Jan 2019, 9:10 PM
1100.1100 - This reviewer is known to me23rd Jan 2019, 1:32 PM

1101-1150

1101.1101 - Learn epidemiology during train rides24th Jan 2019, 10:15 AM
1102.1102 - Unthankful job24th Jan 2019, 10:17 AM
1103.1103 - Collector28th Jan 2019, 2:10 PM
1104.1104 - "Complex" interventions28th Jan 2019, 2:12 PM
1105.1105 - How many books before I understand?29th Jan 2019, 11:24 AM
1106.1106 - First care, then maybe (perhaps) research30th Jan 2019, 7:25 PM
1107.1107 - Trust your profession31st Jan 2019, 3:50 PM
1108.1108 - Exaggerated exaggerations1st Feb 2019, 1:18 PM
1109.1109 - Memory issues1st Feb 2019, 1:25 PM
1110.1110 - Teach what is important to students4th Feb 2019, 2:05 PM
1111.1111 - We don't read the same way4th Feb 2019, 2:10 PM
1112.1112 - One more question survey6th Feb 2019, 12:16 PM
1113.1113 - My theory is better than yours!6th Feb 2019, 12:19 PM
1114.1114 - Free recall EBM7th Feb 2019, 4:06 PM
1115.1115 - Expert in nothing at all7th Feb 2019, 4:09 PM
1116.1116 - Too late to correct8th Feb 2019, 8:24 PM
1117.1117 - Quality varies within11th Feb 2019, 6:34 PM
1118.1118 - Research can begin at a young age12th Feb 2019, 9:50 AM
1119.1119 - A logical preventive strategy13th Feb 2019, 1:29 PM
1120.1120 - 2 years later everything will have to be updated13th Feb 2019, 1:33 PM
1121.1121 - Keep it as a bad example17th Feb 2019, 9:12 PM
1122.1122 - Learning is the easy part18th Feb 2019, 9:42 AM
1123.1123 - A poor selection test19th Feb 2019, 10:41 AM
1124.1124 - How to combine comics and real life20th Feb 2019, 7:08 PM
1125.1125 - Registry entry needs clarity20th Feb 2019, 7:13 PM
1126.1126 - ONE decision aid22nd Feb 2019, 5:53 PM
1127.1127 - Core ideas change over time22nd Feb 2019, 5:56 PM
1128.1128 - Wasting brains23rd Feb 2019, 8:43 AM
1129.1129 - Harms will come later on24th Feb 2019, 6:47 PM
1130.1130 - How far can you get with "what ifs"?25th Feb 2019, 2:11 PM
1131.1131 - Others would be harmed if we disclosed this error26th Feb 2019, 4:23 PM
1132.1132 - High level of certainty analogy27th Feb 2019, 7:35 PM
1133.1133 - Maybe I should try to be famous?1st Mar 2019, 10:33 AM
1134.1134 - Reminder: Question your practices2nd Mar 2019, 11:07 AM
1135.1135 - What follows is the unknown2nd Mar 2019, 11:12 AM
1136.1136 - TIdieR checklist: Epic item3rd Mar 2019, 4:02 PM
1137.1137 - Risk of bias assessment in a randomized controlled trial: Loci method3rd Mar 2019, 4:14 PM
1138.1138 - What does a trial cost?4th Mar 2019, 10:10 AM
1139.1139 - Citizen scientists' hobbies5th Mar 2019, 12:29 PM
1140.1140 - The key to nuance is?6th Mar 2019, 2:16 PM
1141.1141 - If you do research on my comics I do research on you too7th Mar 2019, 8:59 PM
1142.1142 - Minimally important difference in knowledge gain7th Mar 2019, 9:05 PM
1143.1143 - Overdiagnosis illustration puzzle makes you attentive to details8th Mar 2019, 12:02 PM
1144.1144 - Some questions take longer to answer10th Mar 2019, 10:54 AM
1145.1145 - Question (others') practices10th Mar 2019, 11:00 AM
1146.1146 - It becomes too easy...11th Mar 2019, 9:52 PM
1147.1147 - But what did they check?13th Mar 2019, 7:19 PM
1148.1148 - All he wants is attention13th Mar 2019, 7:27 PM
1149.1149 - Can't specialize in everything14th Mar 2019, 3:15 PM
1150.1150 - Research methodologists15th Mar 2019, 2:22 PM

1151-1200

1151.1151 - There is enough unreliable data18th Mar 2019, 2:10 PM
1152.1152 - Is it worth describing things in more details?19th Mar 2019, 4:10 PM
1153.1153 - Random reference chosen20th Mar 2019, 4:56 PM
1154.1154 - Excellent recruitment didn't suffice25th Mar 2019, 7:45 AM
1155.1155 - Delayed impact25th Mar 2019, 8:07 AM
1156.1156 - The Science of Cookies is ever incomplete26th Mar 2019, 1:42 PM
1157.1157 - Dilute the outcome through many measures27th Mar 2019, 1:38 PM
1158.1158 - Barrier to research progress28th Mar 2019, 1:39 PM
1159.1159 - The ceiling was reached already29th Mar 2019, 8:40 PM
1160.1160 - Publications needed for the job31st Mar 2019, 3:55 PM
1161.1161 - Outcome myopia and unintended consequences31st Mar 2019, 3:59 PM
1162.1162 - Upolished data is real data1st Apr 2019, 11:02 AM
1163.1163 - Some things don't reproduce, I'm not telling you which2nd Apr 2019, 3:40 PM
1164.1164 - Impossible guarantees4th Apr 2019, 5:30 PM
1165.1165 - Knowledge loss8th Apr 2019, 8:13 AM
1166.1166 - Medical records for research9th Apr 2019, 9:43 PM
1167.1167 - As far as I am aware...10th Apr 2019, 10:00 PM
1168.1168 - "Cheating" is welcome as long as it is admitted11th Apr 2019, 2:03 PM
1169.1169 - My week in 3 drawings12th Apr 2019, 8:03 PM
1170.1170 - This comic is research13th Apr 2019, 9:00 PM
1171.1171 - The game me her DOI number13th Apr 2019, 9:06 PM
1172.1172 - Trust the evidence (but only believe the experts I show you!)14th Apr 2019, 1:08 PM
1173.1173 - Our name matters a lot14th Apr 2019, 1:12 PM
1174.1174 - Are other correlations spurious?16th Apr 2019, 11:41 AM
1175.1175 - The wrong statistical test should be used16th Apr 2019, 11:49 AM
1176.1176 - Subgroup effects with a straightforward mechanism17th Apr 2019, 2:14 PM
1177.1177 - Participating in research could/should be made fun17th Apr 2019, 2:21 PM
1178.1178 - Stop hiding your comics, researchers!18th Apr 2019, 4:35 PM
1179.1179 - Conferences by proxy19th Apr 2019, 10:04 PM
1180.1180 - His English is poor, that's why20th Apr 2019, 10:20 AM
1181.1181 - Easy to understand for whom?20th Apr 2019, 10:23 AM
1182.1182 - Paid to publish anything22nd Apr 2019, 8:10 AM
1183.1183 - Truth and only truth we shall seek23rd Apr 2019, 4:21 PM
1184.1184 - Unpublished proof can be refuted with...23rd Apr 2019, 4:25 PM
1185.1185 - Only money is a financial conflict, she says23rd Apr 2019, 4:30 PM
1186.1186 - I want to be randomized!23rd Apr 2019, 4:34 PM
1187.1187 - When was it last updated?28th Apr 2019, 6:21 PM
1188.1188 - Transparent as long as it is beneficial to us28th Apr 2019, 6:27 PM
1189.1189 - Anecdote: Drawing a study doesn't help me remember it30th Apr 2019, 8:35 AM
1190.1190 - Evidence based practice "executioners"?2nd May 2019, 1:35 PM
1191.1191 - University kills my interest in research2nd May 2019, 1:48 PM
1192.1192 - Guidelines will change practices, or will they?6th May 2019, 2:31 PM
1193.1193 - The waiting strategy8th May 2019, 7:02 AM
1194.1194 - Save your field before you need to burn it down8th May 2019, 7:06 AM
1195.1195 - A sweet sight9th May 2019, 4:15 PM
1196.1196 - The guild of citizen scientists13th May 2019, 2:40 PM
1197.1197 - Do you adhere to future standards?13th May 2019, 2:42 PM
1198.1198 - A million studies for what?14th May 2019, 4:11 PM
1199.1199 - Use fewer references15th May 2019, 6:56 PM
1200.1200 - Who ever disagrees?16th May 2019, 7:50 PM

1201-1250

1201.1201 - Hard to solve problems17th May 2019, 8:10 PM
1202.1202 - How much lower would the costs be if...?21st May 2019, 7:35 AM
1203.1203 - Comics get their author's reputation21st May 2019, 7:37 AM
1204.1204 - "It was a pleasant experience" issue22nd May 2019, 12:19 PM
1205.1205 - Battery level critical23rd May 2019, 1:14 PM
1206.1206 - Research autopsy23rd May 2019, 1:19 PM
1207.1207 - Data not shared is data...24th May 2019, 9:56 AM
1208.1208 - Staying polite25th May 2019, 9:59 AM
1209.1209 - Pre-req training26th May 2019, 10:01 AM
1210.1210 - Final results won't please many27th May 2019, 10:43 AM
1211.1211 - Randomized controled trial ongoing30th May 2019, 12:03 PM
1212.1212 - "Maybe or maybe not" study protocols30th May 2019, 12:07 PM
1213.1213 - Publishing many reports based on the same data30th May 2019, 12:13 PM
1214.1214 - Can't say that, my English is too poor3rd Jun 2019, 7:41 AM
1215.1215 - Pick a limitation4th Jun 2019, 4:45 PM
1216.1216 - More and more regulations5th Jun 2019, 5:38 PM
1217.Conference EBM Live 16th Jun 2019, 7:58 PM
1218.Conference EBM Live 210th Jun 2019, 8:47 PM
1219.1219 - The way I read changes over time12th Jun 2019, 12:13 PM
1220.1220 - Word limits12th Jun 2019, 12:17 PM
1221.1221 - Meta-researcher13th Jun 2019, 2:41 PM
1222.1222 - Treat before natural history takes care of it18th Jun 2019, 2:14 PM
1223.1223 - Unexpected effects of being a university student18th Jun 2019, 2:19 PM
1224.1224 - Stats are easy... until they aren't19th Jun 2019, 1:15 PM
1225.1225 - Who cares about communicating results?20th Jun 2019, 9:09 AM
1226.1226 - Funny research comics24th Jun 2019, 7:02 PM
1227.1227 - Randomisation table25th Jun 2019, 5:53 PM
1228.1228 - Health authorities audit drug trial25th Jun 2019, 5:58 PM
1229.1229 - Effective but a pain to teach26th Jun 2019, 10:26 PM
1230.1230 - Pseudo-editor28th Jun 2019, 2:38 PM
1231.1231 - "Waiting to be reproduced"28th Jun 2019, 2:44 PM
1232.1232 - RetractionWatch database of retracted studies1st Jul 2019, 8:42 AM
1233.1233 - Wikipedia and researchers meet1st Jul 2019, 8:50 AM
1234.1234 - Post-market studies3rd Jul 2019, 3:08 PM
1235.1235 - Doubt is more affordable3rd Jul 2019, 3:13 PM
1236.1236 - My intuition is fantastic4th Jul 2019, 4:55 PM
1237.1237 - In the shadows they shall remain5th Jul 2019, 10:03 AM
1238.1238 - Glory for firsts, nothing for seconds5th Jul 2019, 10:08 AM
1239.1239 - Intervention changing too quickly6th Jul 2019, 12:19 PM
1240.1240 - Being precise is not enough8th Jul 2019, 5:04 PM
1241.1241 - Too expensive, don't check if it works8th Jul 2019, 5:07 PM
1242.Conference EBM Live 3 - Some thoughts on the 2018 Cochrane Colloquium9th Jul 2019, 12:46 PM
1243.Conference EBM Live 4 - But where are you going?10th Jul 2019, 10:42 AM
1244.Conference EBM Live 5 - Chill is the way to go11th Jul 2019, 7:50 AM
1245.Conference EBM Live 6 - A strategic schedule13th Jul 2019, 6:59 PM
1246.Conference EBM Live 7 - Onwards!14th Jul 2019, 6:49 AM
1247.Conference EBM Live 8 - Travel time means drawing time15th Jul 2019, 6:50 AM
1248.Conference EBM Live 9 - Things keep happening even when you close your eyes16th Jul 2019, 7:27 AM
1249.Conference EBM Live 10 - You can't think ahead of all the details17th Jul 2019, 7:11 AM
1250.Conference EBM Live 11 - An advice you should not follow18th Jul 2019, 2:48 PM

1251-1300

1251.Conference EBM Live 12 - Getting to Oxford is something to celebrate!19th Jul 2019, 11:47 AM
1252.Conference EBM Live 13 - First steps in Oxford19th Jul 2019, 11:51 AM
1253.Conference EBM Live 14 - Getting prepared19th Jul 2019, 11:54 AM
1254.Conference EBM Live 15 - "Only" a conference20th Jul 2019, 12:29 PM
1255.Conference EBM Live 16 - The strength of stereotypes20th Jul 2019, 12:32 PM
1256.Conference EBM Live 17 - First misstep20th Jul 2019, 12:34 PM
1257.Conference EBM Live 18 - Where do I know you from?21st Jul 2019, 10:27 AM
1258.Conference EBM Live 19 - Garside R. Qualitative evidence synthesis21st Jul 2019, 10:30 AM
1259.Conference EBM Live 20 - Everyone can hear you anyway (or can they?)21st Jul 2019, 10:34 AM
1260.Conference EBM Live 21 - But what should I draw, actually?22nd Jul 2019, 6:54 AM
1261.Conference EBM Live 22 - Gartlehner G. Answering questions from the public22nd Jul 2019, 7:09 AM
1262.Conference EBM Live 23 - Gartlehner G. European laws22nd Jul 2019, 7:16 AM
1263.Conference EBM Live 24 - Coffee time!23rd Jul 2019, 10:38 AM
1264.Conference EBM Live 25 - Tricco A. Looking for the right question23rd Jul 2019, 10:39 AM
1265.Conference EBM Live 26 - Tricco A. Take the time to do things well23rd Jul 2019, 10:44 AM
1266.Conference EBM Live 27 - Transition24th Jul 2019, 6:40 AM
1267.Conference EBM Live 28 - Arienti C. Difficulties in reproducing rehabilitation interventions24th Jul 2019, 6:45 AM
1268.Conference EBM Live 29 - Moving from room to room24th Jul 2019, 7:23 AM
1269.Conference EBM Live 30 - "Lightning" talks25th Jul 2019, 11:27 AM
1270.Conference EBM Live 31 - Say who you are first25th Jul 2019, 11:29 AM
1271.Conference EBM Live 32 - Brassey, J. Better ways to find the evidence25th Jul 2019, 11:36 AM
1272.Conference EBM Live 33 - Stephenson, T. Reducing Questionable Research Practices and Bias26th Jul 2019, 6:18 AM
1273.Conference EBM Live 34 - Stephenson, T. Reducing Questionable Research Practices and Bias p226th Jul 2019, 6:19 AM
1274.Conference EBM Live 35 - Reboot27th Jul 2019, 12:54 PM
1275.Conference EBM Live 36 - Improving the reporting of harms27th Jul 2019, 12:57 PM
1276.Conference EBM Live 37 - McCulloch, P. IDEAL and Research Waste in the Study of Complex Interventions27th Jul 2019, 1:17 PM
1277.Conference EBM Live 38 - McCulloch, P. IDEAL and Research Waste in the Study of Complex Interventions p227th Jul 2019, 1:21 PM
1278.Conference EBM Live 39 - End of the first day27th Jul 2019, 1:49 PM
1279.Conference EBM Live 40 - Initial drawings27th Jul 2019, 1:51 PM
1280.Conference EBM Live 41 - Allen, C. The use of evidence in humanitarian response decision making28th Jul 2019, 4:25 PM
1281.Conference EBM Live 42 - Note taking28th Jul 2019, 4:39 PM
1282.Conference EBM Live 43 - Is more education THE solution?28th Jul 2019, 4:42 PM
1283.Conference EBM Live 44 - Fechtelpeter, D. Decision aids for organized cancer screening in Germany28th Jul 2019, 4:46 PM
1284.Conference EBM Live 45 - Already too used to conferences28th Jul 2019, 4:58 PM
1285.Conference EBM Live 46 - Vandvik, P. O. BMJ Rapid Recommendations29th Jul 2019, 11:21 AM
1286.Conference EBM Live 47 - Vandvik, P. O. BMJ Rapid Recommendations p229th Jul 2019, 11:28 AM
1287.Conference EBM Live 48 - Adler, A. Assessment of state-supported treatments29th Jul 2019, 11:32 AM
1288.Conference EBM Live 49 - Inclusion29th Jul 2019, 11:40 AM
1289.Conference EBM Live 50 - Other attendees30th Jul 2019, 10:17 AM
1290.Conference EBM Live 51 - Wicks, P. “What’s in it for us? Conditional altruism and the social contract of research participation”30th Jul 2019, 10:20 AM
1291.Conference EBM Live 52 - Wicks, P. “What’s in it for us? Conditional altruism and the social contract of research participation” p230th Jul 2019, 10:25 AM
1292.Conference EBM Live 53 - Survey30th Jul 2019, 10:58 AM
1293.Conférence EBM Live 54 - Wicks, P. “What’s in it for us? Conditional altruism and the social contract of research participation” p330th Jul 2019, 11:02 AM
1294.Conference EBM Live 55 - Goldacre, B. How to make summary results available31st Jul 2019, 4:31 PM
1295.Conference EBM Live 56 - Goldacre, B. How to make summary results available p231st Jul 2019, 4:36 PM
1296.Conference EBM Live 57 - Devito, N. How to make summary results available p331st Jul 2019, 4:40 PM
1297.Conference EBM Live 58 - Drysdale, H. How to make summary results available p431st Jul 2019, 4:46 PM
1298.Conference EBM Live 59 - Down the rabbit hole1st Aug 2019, 4:35 PM
1299.Conference EBM Live 60 - Deveson, P. The history of conflicts of interests2nd Aug 2019, 11:16 AM
1300.Conference EBM Live 61 - Deveson, P. The history of conflicts of interests p22nd Aug 2019, 11:22 AM

1301-1350

1301.Conference EBM Live 62 - Comments "questions"2nd Aug 2019, 11:26 AM
1302.Conference EBM Live 63 - Boutron, I. "Spin" or the distortion of research results3rd Aug 2019, 2:05 PM
1303.Conference EBM Live 64 - Lenzer, J. 17 years spent investigating biases and (legal) fraud in research3rd Aug 2019, 2:08 PM
1304.Conference EBM Live 65 - Lenzer, J. 17 years spent investigating biases and (legal) fraud in research p23rd Aug 2019, 2:13 PM
1305.Conference EBM Live 66 - Mandeville, K. Conflicts of interest: The next frontier for disclosure5th Aug 2019, 8:38 AM
1306.Conference EBM Live 67 - Mandeville, K. Conflicts of interest: The next frontier for disclosure p25th Aug 2019, 8:39 AM
1307.Conference EBM Live 68 - Conflicts of interests: Together we shall build the future6th Aug 2019, 7:54 AM
1308.Conference EBM Live 69 - Conflicts of interests: Together we shall build the future p26th Aug 2019, 7:57 AM
1309.Conference EBM Live 70 - Conflicts of interests: Together we shall build the future p36th Aug 2019, 8:02 AM
1310.Conference EBM Live 71 - Conflicts of interests: Together we shall build the future p46th Aug 2019, 8:04 AM
1311.Conference EBM Live 72 - Conflicts of interests: Together we shall build the future p56th Aug 2019, 8:05 AM
1312.Conference EBM Live 73 - Conflicts of interests: Together we shall build the future p66th Aug 2019, 8:07 AM
1313.Conference EBM Live 74 - Conflicts of interests: Together we shall build the future p76th Aug 2019, 8:10 AM
1314.Conference EBM Live 75 - Ksenia, E. Evidence Based Medicine in Russia7th Aug 2019, 11:44 AM
1315.Conference EBM Live 76 - Nullus in verba7th Aug 2019, 11:48 AM
1316.Conference EBM Live 77 - "No need to assess my idea"7th Aug 2019, 11:49 AM
1317.Conference EBM Live 78 - Ioannidis, J. P. A. Reproducible Evidence for Healthcare8th Aug 2019, 9:13 AM
1318.Conference EBM Live 79 - Ioannidis, J. P. A. Reproducible Evidence for Healthcare p28th Aug 2019, 9:14 AM
1319.Conference EBM Live 80 - Ioannidis, J. P. A. Reproducible Evidence for Healthcare p38th Aug 2019, 9:15 AM
1320.Conference EBM Live 81 - Ioannidis, J. P. A. Reproducible Evidence for Healthcare p48th Aug 2019, 9:20 AM
1321.Conference EBM Live 82 - Strong and weak points of EBM Live 20198th Aug 2019, 9:21 AM
1322.Conference EBM Live 83 - Future awaits!8th Aug 2019, 9:21 AM
1323.Conference EBM Live 84 - High value thoughts9th Aug 2019, 8:07 AM
1324.Conference EBM Live 85 - Going back home9th Aug 2019, 8:09 AM
1325.Conference EBM Live 86 - Out-of-context citations9th Aug 2019, 8:11 AM
1326.Conference EBM Live 87 - Recall questions9th Aug 2019, 8:14 AM
1327.Conference EBM Live 88 - The-day-after syndrome9th Aug 2019, 8:18 AM
1328.1328 - Transition 120th Aug 2019, 6:36 PM
1329.1329 - Transition 220th Aug 2019, 6:38 PM
1330.1330 - Transition 320th Aug 2019, 6:40 PM
1331.1331 - Transition 420th Aug 2019, 6:41 PM
1332.1332 - Transition 520th Aug 2019, 6:41 PM
1333.1333 - Transition 620th Aug 2019, 6:41 PM
1334.1334 - Transition 720th Aug 2019, 6:43 PM
1335.1335 - Transition 820th Aug 2019, 6:43 PM
1336.1336 - Transition 920th Aug 2019, 6:45 PM
1337.1337 - Transition 10 - CC-BY-SA20th Aug 2019, 6:46 PM
1338.1338 - Transition 11 - English has come!21st Aug 2019, 10:47 PM
1339.1339 - Transition 11 - And French is on a leave22nd Aug 2019, 10:07 PM
1340.1340 - Comics shall now be in English, okay but...25th Aug 2019, 1:08 PM
1341.1341 - Concerns about French readers25th Aug 2019, 1:11 PM
1342.1342 - What do you translate or not and past mistakes25th Aug 2019, 1:13 PM
1343.1343 - Maybe I did warn myself about it...25th Aug 2019, 1:15 PM
1344.1344 - Embrace uncertainty (and maybe listen to what you wrote in the past)25th Aug 2019, 1:18 PM
1345.1345 - Moving on25th Aug 2019, 1:19 PM
1346.1346 - Joining #FridaysForFuture?30th Aug 2019, 2:33 PM
1347.1347 - Stronger as a team but there is more...6th Sep 2019, 8:12 PM
1348.1348 - Is joining a movement about anecdotes?6th Sep 2019, 8:15 PM
1349.1349 - Remember the end goal6th Sep 2019, 8:17 PM
1350.1350 - Picking the best strategy, not just the ones I know about6th Sep 2019, 8:20 PM

1351-1400

1351.1351 - Opportunity costs and real life6th Sep 2019, 8:22 PM
1352.1352 - How could YOU best contribute, given your abilities?6th Sep 2019, 8:24 PM
1353.1353 - A platform for research on climate change p16th Sep 2019, 8:26 PM
1354.1354 - A platform for research on climate change p212th Oct 2019, 8:34 PM
1355.1355 - A platform for research on climate change p312th Oct 2019, 8:36 PM
1356.1356 - A platform for research on climate change p412th Oct 2019, 8:37 PM
1357.1357 - A platform for research on climate change p512th Oct 2019, 8:39 PM
1358.1358 - A platform for research on climate change p612th Oct 2019, 8:42 PM
1359.1359 - A platform for research on climate change p712th Oct 2019, 8:43 PM
1360.1360 - A platform for research on climate change p812th Oct 2019, 8:44 PM
1361.1361 - A platform for research on climate change p912th Oct 2019, 8:45 PM
1362.1362 - A platform for research on climate change p10 (Ending)12th Oct 2019, 8:46 PM
1363.1363 - Cherry picking criticisms13th Oct 2019, 10:30 AM
1364.1364 - Randomized trials you can try at home14th Oct 2019, 1:24 PM
1365.1365 - How should I appraise this study?15th Oct 2019, 1:55 PM
1366.1366 - Our field is too different from other ones15th Oct 2019, 1:58 PM
1367.1367 - Beliefs change over time16th Oct 2019, 2:34 PM
1368.1368 - When citizen science evolves...16th Oct 2019, 2:41 PM
1369.1369 - A biography about whom, exactly?16th Oct 2019, 2:43 PM
1370.1370 - The original was good, what about the others?16th Oct 2019, 2:44 PM
1371.1371 - Keeping my hobbies hidden16th Oct 2019, 2:46 PM
1372.1372 - The duty of the first pioneers16th Oct 2019, 2:48 PM
1373.1373 - To the edge of knowledge16th Oct 2019, 2:50 PM
1374.1374 - Come join us at the edge!16th Oct 2019, 2:51 PM
1375.1375 - Ethical disagreements16th Oct 2019, 2:52 PM
1376.1376 - Excessively broad criterias16th Oct 2019, 2:59 PM
1377.1377 - Data, everything is data!16th Oct 2019, 3:01 PM
1378.1378 - The geocache of forking paths16th Oct 2019, 3:02 PM
1379.1379 - But how were these search results ranked?16th Oct 2019, 3:04 PM
1380.1380 - Adjudicating harms16th Oct 2019, 3:06 PM
1381.1381 - How many studies is enough?16th Oct 2019, 3:07 PM
1382.1382 - How "little" do you know?16th Oct 2019, 3:09 PM
1383.1383 - This agency does her job too well16th Oct 2019, 3:10 PM
1384.1384 - Keeping a neutral view on journals16th Oct 2019, 3:13 PM
1385.1385 - Job security or the benefit of all?16th Oct 2019, 3:14 PM
1386.1386 - Data was archived as per legal requirements16th Oct 2019, 3:16 PM
1387.1387 - A long lineage of meta-researchers16th Oct 2019, 3:18 PM
1388.1388 - Not an expert16th Oct 2019, 3:19 PM
1389.1389 - It's not such a bold idea as it looks like16th Oct 2019, 3:21 PM
1390.1390 - Problems in their field are their problems16th Oct 2019, 3:23 PM
1391.1391 - The answer is somewhere in there16th Oct 2019, 3:24 PM
1392.1392 - On what evidence did you rely to build the Cochrane Collaboration?16th Oct 2019, 3:26 PM
1393.1393 - Five publications per year quota16th Oct 2019, 3:28 PM
1394.1394 - The 1 in a 100016th Oct 2019, 3:30 PM
1395.1395 - There is a conference for everyone16th Oct 2019, 3:31 PM
1396.1396 - Send them to the studies or to the flaws?16th Oct 2019, 3:33 PM
1397.1397 - Reasons for not coming16th Oct 2019, 3:35 PM
1398.1398 - Quit studying to study more?16th Oct 2019, 3:37 PM
1399.1399 - I need to breathe16th Oct 2019, 3:38 PM
1400.1400 - Retractions are progress16th Oct 2019, 3:39 PM

1401-1450

1401.1401 - When heroes become humans again19th Oct 2019, 7:57 PM
1402.1402 - At which point is it worth going to this conference?19th Oct 2019, 7:59 PM
1403.1403 - The last thoughts of a data scientist19th Oct 2019, 8:00 PM
1404.1404 - Bold claims require strong evidence19th Oct 2019, 8:02 PM
1405.1405 - Citations flow over the years19th Oct 2019, 8:03 PM
1406.1406 - Just ask the ethics committee19th Oct 2019, 8:04 PM
1407.1407 - Who cannot read the results?19th Oct 2019, 8:06 PM
1408.1408 - They prefered misunderstanding19th Oct 2019, 8:08 PM
1409.1409 - Strongest scientific contribution isn't research19th Oct 2019, 8:09 PM
1410.1410 - Data sharing won't fix everything19th Oct 2019, 8:11 PM
1411.1411 - Stereotypes against scientists19th Oct 2019, 8:12 PM
1412.1412 - Use resources at your disposal19th Oct 2019, 8:14 PM
1413.1413 - Only the comic strip illustrator knew19th Oct 2019, 8:16 PM
1414.1414 - Opportunistic places to learn19th Oct 2019, 8:17 PM
1415.1415 - The ethics committee won't understand19th Oct 2019, 8:19 PM
1416.1416 - You can't do it all alone, but can you lead it all alone?19th Oct 2019, 8:20 PM
1417.1417 - It is too late to test this new intervention19th Oct 2019, 8:22 PM
1418.1418 - Well done research, but something important was missing19th Oct 2019, 8:23 PM
1419.1419 - My trust is something you earn, not something you deserve19th Oct 2019, 8:25 PM
1420.1420 - Opportunities weren't equal19th Oct 2019, 8:26 PM
1421.1421 - Farewell, my heroes19th Oct 2019, 8:28 PM
1422.1422 - Not all that is on Wikipedia is current19th Oct 2019, 8:30 PM
1423.1423 - Open the sequentially numbered envelopes as instructed21st Oct 2019, 1:28 PM
1424.1424 - Unstoppable will to do something else21st Oct 2019, 1:29 PM
1425.1425 - Game of Incentives21st Oct 2019, 1:32 PM
1426.1426 - A stranger among strangers21st Oct 2019, 1:33 PM
1427.1427 - I've cracked the code, nothing can block me!21st Oct 2019, 1:35 PM
1428.1428 - Self-doubt creeps in again21st Oct 2019, 1:37 PM
1429.1429 - Ask a methodologist maybe?21st Oct 2019, 1:39 PM
1430.1430 - I can do it all, but maybe not all the time21st Oct 2019, 1:40 PM
1431.1431 - "Because I'm the one teaching"?21st Oct 2019, 1:44 PM
1432.1432 - Approved as an exception29th Oct 2019, 2:10 PM
1433.1433 - Assessing researchers based on ALL they have done29th Oct 2019, 2:13 PM
1434.1434 - I'll analyze the data wrongly if I want29th Oct 2019, 2:14 PM
1435.1435 - I'll analyze the data wrongly if I want p229th Oct 2019, 2:15 PM
1436.1436 - Better conference posters29th Oct 2019, 2:17 PM
1437.1437 - Everything was a misunderstanding29th Oct 2019, 2:19 PM
1438.1438 - The focus was finishing her master's thesis, not reducing waste29th Oct 2019, 2:20 PM
1439.1439 - It doesn't stay "new" for long29th Oct 2019, 2:23 PM
1440.1440 - You don't have the authority to prevent waste29th Oct 2019, 2:24 PM
1441.1441 - Reviewers disagree29th Oct 2019, 2:26 PM
1442.1442 - Different study design, same issues29th Oct 2019, 2:28 PM
1443.1443 - Borderline clever29th Oct 2019, 2:29 PM
1444.1444 - The unknown is the fun part29th Oct 2019, 2:31 PM
1445.1445 - Pick a mentor4th Nov 2019, 9:59 PM
1446.1446 - Driven by complexity4th Nov 2019, 10:02 PM
1447.1447 - Halloween 20194th Nov 2019, 10:03 PM
1448.1448 - On reasonable request4th Nov 2019, 10:04 PM
1449.1449 - This peer-review wasn't worth it4th Nov 2019, 10:05 PM
1450.1450 - Smallest publishable unit4th Nov 2019, 10:07 PM

1451-1500

1451.1451 - There are good and less good times to read research4th Nov 2019, 10:08 PM
1452.1452 - Under review until [insert date]4th Nov 2019, 10:09 PM
1453.1453 - I've got a comic strip on this!15th Nov 2019, 10:23 AM
1454.1454 - Moving beyond "Can you do it?"15th Nov 2019, 10:25 AM
1455.1455 - Use only n references27th Nov 2019, 3:38 PM
1456.1456 - How good are these comics?27th Nov 2019, 3:44 PM
1457.1457 - Can't tweet this27th Nov 2019, 3:46 PM
1458.1458 - More citations more visibility27th Nov 2019, 3:47 PM
1459.1459 - Correctly citing retracted studies27th Nov 2019, 3:48 PM
1460.1460 - How fake is this conference?27th Nov 2019, 3:50 PM
1461.1461 - The 24h sciart challenge27th Nov 2019, 3:52 PM
1462.1462 - Close to the statistical threshold27th Nov 2019, 3:52 PM
1463.1463 - Consider p-values given [context]27th Nov 2019, 3:54 PM
1464.1464 - Not intrinsically better ideas27th Nov 2019, 3:56 PM
1465.1465 - Methods will be published27th Nov 2019, 3:58 PM
1466.1466 - How inclusive was this conference?27th Nov 2019, 3:59 PM
1467.1467 - More time for research, less time for ...?27th Nov 2019, 4:01 PM
1468.1468 - Please give me an infrastructure, not a single study27th Nov 2019, 4:02 PM
1469.1469 - Teaching the teacher how to teach27th Nov 2019, 4:05 PM
1470.1470 - Unpublished results wasted my death27th Nov 2019, 4:07 PM
1471.1471 - Surrogate outcomes p127th Nov 2019, 4:10 PM
1472.1472 - Surrogate outcomes p227th Nov 2019, 4:15 PM
1473.1473 - Surrogate outcomes p327th Nov 2019, 4:17 PM
1474.1474 - Surrogate outcomes p427th Nov 2019, 4:19 PM
1475.1475 - Surrogate outcomes p527th Nov 2019, 4:21 PM
1476.1476 - Surrogate outcomes p627th Nov 2019, 4:23 PM
1477.1477 - Was that a date or a data analyst?3rd Jan 2020, 11:50 AM
1478.1478 - Forgotten experiments that never worked3rd Jan 2020, 11:53 AM
1479.1479 - Healthy anomalies3rd Jan 2020, 11:54 AM
1480.1480 - Differential follow-up duration3rd Jan 2020, 11:56 AM
1481.1481 - Repeat until you get it wrong by chance3rd Jan 2020, 11:57 AM
1482.1482 - Start small and incremental improvements3rd Jan 2020, 11:59 AM
1483.1483 - The day they became "normal"3rd Jan 2020, 12:00 PM
1484.1484 - Academics becoming too remote from clinical practice3rd Jan 2020, 12:02 PM
1485.1485 - Anonymization was done4th Aug 2020, 3:04 PM
1486.1486 - Your best collaborator is yourself 6 months ago4th Aug 2020, 3:07 PM
1487.1487 - Subjective field boundaries4th Aug 2020, 3:09 PM
1488.1488 - Are your past publications a good representation of what you currently believe?4th Aug 2020, 3:09 PM
1489.1489 - Covid-19 productivity gap4th Aug 2020, 3:12 PM
1490.1490 - Are you listening to other fields of research?4th Aug 2020, 3:12 PM
1491.1491 - Protected by research or protected from research?4th Aug 2020, 3:13 PM
1492.1492 - What isn't on your flashcards?4th Aug 2020, 3:14 PM
1493.1493 - How does it feel when authors don't take your comments into account?4th Aug 2020, 3:15 PM
1494.1494 - Informative journal titles4th Aug 2020, 3:17 PM
1495.1495 - Mandatory fields to register for a research conference4th Aug 2020, 3:18 PM
1496.1496 - Old research in the times of Covid-194th Aug 2020, 3:19 PM
1497.1497 - References were selected purposefuly4th Aug 2020, 3:19 PM
1498.1498 - Attending online research conferences is so difficult...4th Aug 2020, 3:20 PM
1499.1499 - Unlikely to ever be reproduced4th Aug 2020, 3:22 PM
1500.1500 - Getting into pet project troubles4th Aug 2020, 3:22 PM

1501-1550

1501.1501 - How to get your research funded, comic 640 returns!4th Aug 2020, 3:23 PM
1502.1502 - Everything gets "covidized"4th Aug 2020, 3:24 PM
1503.1503 - When all studies focus on one thing and one thing only4th Aug 2020, 3:25 PM
1504.1504 - When one treatment gets almost all the attention4th Aug 2020, 3:26 PM
1505.1505 - Can't think clearly21st Feb 2021, 6:24 PM
1506.1506 - Criticizing what one can criticize21st Feb 2021, 6:26 PM
1507.1507 - Peer-reviewing manuscripts out of certain death21st Feb 2021, 6:28 PM
1508.1508 - Collecting more data was a distraction21st Feb 2021, 6:30 PM
1509.1509 - Looking for state funding21st Feb 2021, 6:31 PM
1510.1510 - Claiming a level of in-depth knowledge21st Feb 2021, 6:32 PM
1511.1511 - Learning practical skills through research21st Feb 2021, 6:34 PM
1512.1512 - Working with disappearing tools5th Mar 2021, 4:19 PM
1513.1513 - Backup, backup, backup5th Mar 2021, 4:22 PM
1514.1514 - A doctoral undergraduate thesis5th Mar 2021, 4:23 PM
1515.1515 - Path of least ethical resistance5th Mar 2021, 4:26 PM
1516.1516 - Feeling left out of the research field5th Mar 2021, 4:28 PM
1517.1517 - Priviledged11th Mar 2021, 4:37 PM
1518.1518 - Data validation11th Mar 2021, 4:40 PM
1519.1519 - Not expecting citations11th Mar 2021, 4:41 PM
1520.1520 - Peer reviewers' efforts11th Mar 2021, 4:42 PM
1521.1521 - Nobody will like you afterwards11th Mar 2021, 4:43 PM
1522.1522 - Unfundable11th Mar 2021, 4:44 PM
1523.1523 - Unregulated use29th Mar 2021, 8:05 AM
1524.1524 - Should be blow up the study?29th Mar 2021, 8:36 AM
1525.1525 - Journals are demeaning29th Mar 2021, 8:38 AM
1526.1526 - Measuring social things29th Mar 2021, 8:40 AM
1527.1527 - If others do it, why can't I?29th Mar 2021, 8:42 AM
1528.1528 - Raw qualitative data will be plenty enough29th Mar 2021, 8:43 AM
1529.1529 - Supportive managers29th Mar 2021, 8:45 AM
1530.1530 - I don't know the harms of what we do29th Mar 2021, 8:48 AM
1531.1531 - Publication bias recruitment question29th Mar 2021, 8:53 AM
1532.1532 - Ask us first22nd Apr 2021, 3:59 PM
1533.1533 - Just a few data please22nd Apr 2021, 4:19 PM
1534.1534 - Beyond scales22nd Apr 2021, 4:21 PM
1535.1535 - Some data shared after all22nd Apr 2021, 4:22 PM
1536.1536 - There is maybe research on this topic22nd Apr 2021, 4:24 PM
1537.1537 - Useful research skills22nd Apr 2021, 4:26 PM
1538.1538 - Fancy prereq22nd Apr 2021, 4:27 PM
1539.1539 - Reading will not be an absolute priority22nd Apr 2021, 4:29 PM
1540.1540 - Religiously believing22nd Apr 2021, 4:31 PM
1541.1541 - Research is impacting home life22nd Apr 2021, 4:32 PM
1542.1542 - Discovery is addictive22nd Apr 2021, 4:34 PM
1543.1543 - Vague22nd Apr 2021, 4:36 PM
1544.1544 - Absolutely not fraud8th Jun 2021, 1:46 PM
1545.1545 - The right research shortcut8th Jun 2021, 1:48 PM
1546.1546 - Silent knowledge8th Jun 2021, 1:50 PM
1547.1547 - This way is the only way8th Jun 2021, 1:51 PM
1548.1548 - The power of mentors over methods8th Jun 2021, 1:53 PM
1549.1549 - Not guaranteed to turn into a great practitioner8th Jun 2021, 1:54 PM
1550.1550 - Reading at work8th Jun 2021, 1:55 PM

1551-1600

1551.1551 - Who know this study was retracted?8th Jun 2021, 1:56 PM
1552.1552 - Time spent learning nothing new8th Jun 2021, 1:59 PM
1553.1553 - The value of not reading something8th Jun 2021, 2:00 PM
1554.1554 - Too mobile for long-term research?8th Jun 2021, 2:01 PM
1555.1555 - Well advertised, much wanted?8th Jun 2021, 2:03 PM